Home Online Casinos Betspin Casino Review

Betspin Casino Review

Players from United States Not Accepted
8.2 Rating
Good
Reputation
Players from United States Not Accepted
Good
Reputation
This review was last updated: 2018-06-29T00:00Z  

We have conducted review of Betspin Casino based on reputation rating according to complaints along with casino features like payment methods, promotions or available games. Betspin Casino belongs to above average online casinos with some room for improvement. Read our review to find more information about player's complaints, withdrawal process or any available Betspin Casino bonus codes.

Residents from
United States
Not accepted
IP addr. from
United States
Not blocked
VPN
usage
Prohibited
Website
Language
English (+3)
Live Chat
Language
English (+3)
Email Support
Language
English (+3)
No Deposit Bonus
Not available
Deposit Bonus
Not available
Payment Methods
Game providers
Owner
MT SecureTrade Limited
Established
2015
Withdrawal limit
Not Limited
Licensing Authorities
Malta
Perfect
United Kingdom
Perfect
Interesting Facts
  • Small casino targeting Europe and Scandinavia
Positives
  • No withdrawal limits
  • Live chat support is available 24/7
Negatives
  • Only roulette from live dealer games

Complaints about Betspin Casino and related casinos (16)

We have conducted extensive research on the web and as a result we have found following 16 complaints on Betspin Casino or any brands that might be interconnected with it. Taking into account seriousness and credibility of these complaints and estimated size of casino revenues we decided to give Betspin Casino a Good reputation.

Good Casino Reputation
Direct complaints about Betspin Casino
Uncertain case, good regulator
Black points: 105
All winnings canceled, player accused of a T&C breach, uncertain case.
Player complained she had asked for a withdrawal but all her winnings were canceled because she had been accused of terms and conditions breach. The casino didn't reply and kept saying there were some technical issues. No reply or proofs from the casino, uncertain case.
 
This complaint is from 2/2017
Disputed amount: £2,728 (bonus money)
Read more on: askgamblers.com
Read more
Complaints on related SuperLenny Casino (Same management)
Generous casino
Black points: -13
Failed self-exclusion.
Player complained that he wanted to deposit £20 but deposited £100 by mistake. He contacted the live support and asked for a refund. However his account got closed. When he asked for a reason the live support replied to him that he had self-excluded himself from a sister casino site - which should be valid for all the brands from that group. He asked why his account hadn't been closed in the past 8 months or why they had accepted his deposit. He got no reply from the casino. The casino then replied in the complaint that his deposit would be returned, no more update.
 
This complaint is from 9/2016
Disputed amount: £100 (real money)
Read more on: askgamblers.com
Read more
Complaints on related Highroller Casino (Same management)
Delayed payment, likely paid
Black points: 100
Delayed payment.
Player pointed out to the fact that he didn't have any issues with a withdrawal before, that is why this delay in payment transfer surprised him. He was in touch with the casino support who told him there had been a global outage in payments and that he might've been affected. No more update since, the player has probably been paid.
 
This complaint is from 2/2018
Disputed amount: 25,000 kr (real money)
Read more on: askgamblers.com
Read more
Complaints on related Thrills Casino (Same management)
Stupid excuse or fraud
Black points: 4800
Player accused of being from a restricted country, all funds seized.
Player complained that after he opened an account, made a deposit, won and asked for a withdrawal his winning was seized as it turned out he had been playing from a restricted country and his winning was canceled, only the deposit returned. Player didn't understand how come he had been able to play despite being from a restricted country. Casino replied that it was stated in the terms and conditions and the situation of him being able to play was temporary, then they said it was due to a technical issue. Player was advised to seek further help with the licensing authority.
 
This complaint is from 10/2015
Disputed amount: €2,145 (real money)
Read more on: askgamblers.com
Read more
Failed self-exclusion
Black points: 611
Failed self-exclusion, account closed, funds seized, deposit returned.
Player complained he played in the casino with his real money but as his wife had already had an account there so he was not eligible for a welcome bonus. After he made some winnings his account was blocked. Casino replied this was because only one account is permitted per a household and later they also pointed out to the fact that the player had self-excluded himself from the group of casinos that belong to the same brand. Player's deposit was returned.
 
This complaint is from 11/2015
Disputed amount: £500 (real money)
Read more on: askgamblers.com
Read more
Insufficient evidence from casino
Black points: 250
Delayed payment, sent to a wrong bank account.
Player complained the casino had transferred the money to a wrong bank account. Player didn't understand this as two days prior to this withdrawal he had successfully received one withdrawal. Casino replied they had asked a bank to track down the payment and that it might take up to 16 weeks. Player was very upset about this fact, we don't know what was the final resolution of this case.
 
This complaint is from 1/2017
Disputed amount: A$400 (bonus money)
Read more on: askgamblers.com
Read more
Insufficient evidence from casino
Black points: 250
Fraud accusation, account blocked, all funds seized.
Player complained that after he had achieved some winning from a free bonus and made a deposit prior to the withdrawal of his winnings his account was suddenly blocked and the deposit returned to him. When he asked the casino for a reason they replied that the user was a fraud. Player refused strictly such accusation and provided proofs of him being in theright. He was advised to turn to the licensing authority.
 
This complaint is from 5/2016
Disputed amount: ?? (bonus money)
Read more on: askgamblers.com
Read more
Complaints on related Kaboo Casino (Same management)
Uncertain case, good regulator
Black points: 250
The terms and conditions were breached due to a self-exclusion at the casino´s sister casino and all the funds were returned to the player´s account.
Nicholas made a withdrawal previously without any problems. But when he requested a much bigger withdrawal of £9,246 he was denied due to a self-exclusion in their sister casino. He had no idea they are sister casinos and was also surprised that he was able to withdraw much smaller amount previously without any hesitation from the casino. The complaint remains unresolved and has waited for an answer from the MGA (Malta Gaming Authority).
 
This complaint is from 10/2015
Disputed amount: £9,246 (real money)
Read more on: askgamblers.com
Read more
Uncertain case, good regulator
Black points: 158
The terms and conditions of self-exclusion were breached and all the deposits were returned to the player.
The player made three deposits and won £1,200. When the player tried to login into the account, the access was denied and he/she was asked to contact the support team. The casino informed the player that the account was closed due to the self-exclusion at one of their sister casinos. The casino decided to return the player´s deposit. There is no further information on the case.
 
This complaint is from 5/2016
Disputed amount: £1,200 (real money)
Read more on: askgamblers.com
Read more
Uncertain case, good regulator
Black points: 131
Due to terms and conditions about self-exclusion being breached, the account was closed and all the funds were returned.
The player requested a withdrawal of £1,000 but was denied due to the self-exclusion at the casino´s sister casino. There is no further information on the case.
 
This complaint is from 5/2015
Disputed amount: £1,000 (real money)
Read more on: askgamblers.com
Read more
Uncertain case, good regulator
Black points: 100
The terms and conditions were breached due to a self-exclusion at the casino´s sister casino and the deposit was returned.
The player, MILNEJ2, requested a withdrawal of £360 and sent all the documents for verification. Shortly after that, his account was closed and the funds were returned to him. The casino claimed he self-excluded himself in one of their sister casinos. The player claimed that he didn´t know about the other casino being their sister casino and was surprised that he was able to sign in with the same details, deposit money, and play. The casino apologized to the player for the inconvenience but there was nothing else they could do about it. There was no information online about these two casinos being sister casinos. No further information on this case is available.
 
This complaint is from 10/2015
Disputed amount: £360 (real money)
Read more on: askgamblers.com
Read more
Uncertain case, good regulator
Black points: 100
The terms and conditions about self-exclusion were breached and all funds were returned to the player.
Joeshmo requested a withdrawal of £250 but was denied due to the self-exclusion at one of the casino´s sister site. His winnings were confiscated and his deposits were returned to him. The player mentioned that there was no information online about these casinos being sister sites. There is no further information on this case and it remains unresolved.
 
This complaint is from 11/2015
Disputed amount: £250 (real money)
Read more on: askgamblers.com
Read more
Uncertain case, good regulator
Black points: 100
The access to the account was denied and all the funds were seized without a relevant explanation to the player.
The player was denied an access into the account. When the player read other complaints about self-excluded players at the casino´s sister site, he/she realized that this would probably be the same case. The player didn´t have any idea that these casinos were sister casinos. A player requested a refund of his deposits and AskGamblers had recommended contacting the MGA (Malta Gaming Authority). There is no further information on the case.
 
This complaint is from 11/2015
Disputed amount: £200 (real money)
Read more on: askgamblers.com
Read more
Show 5 similiar complaints with 589 black points in total
Complaints on related Guts Casino (Same management)
Failed self-exclusion
Black points: 3666
Failed self-exclusion.
Player complained that he was allowed to open an account in this casino despite the fact that he had self-excluded himself permanently in all casinos with the same group owner. Player had made some deposits and lost and he demanded a refund. Casino replied that at the time when the player self-excluded himself the casino was owned by a different group and thus the delay in accounts verification after the acquisition. The player complained about the slow responsiveness of the casino. No more update.
 
This complaint is from 5/2017
Disputed amount: £2,840 (real money)
Read more on: askgamblers.com
Read more
Uncertain case, good regulator
Black points: 250
Extremely long verification process.
Player complained that after he won a large amount he was asked by the casino to send all kinds of identity-proving documents. Additionally, he was asked to send another proof of address and was told to upload it via the website but as his account was suspended he was unable to do so so he sent it via email but the casino kept telling him to upload it via the website. Then he was asked to send again a bank statement. He didn't understand what was wrong with the statement he had already provided recently but the casino wouldn't clarify this for him. The player felt he was being mistreated. Casino support manager replied to him several times that his matter would be carefully investigated. No more update since.
 
This complaint is from 12/2016
Disputed amount: £13,791 (real money)
Read more on: askgamblers.com
Read more
Technical glitch
Black points: 0
Software glitch.
Player complained that while he had been playing a game and winning there was a malfunction that caused an unfair result. Player reported this to the casino which was taking a very long time to reply. They replied they were waiting for the game provider to investigate on this. No more update since.
 
This complaint is from 8/2015
Disputed amount: ?? (real money)
Read more on: askgamblers.com
Read more

Have you found a relevant complaint about this casino, or do you have personal bad experience? Help others and submit your complaint.

Submit a complaint
* We only list complaints, where the casino might be breaking our Fair Gambling Codex.

Betspin Casino Bonus

8.2
/10
Good Casino reputation reputation

1st Deposit Bonus - Betspin Casino

Not Available in United States
  • Minimal deposit: €20
  • Wagering requirements: 20x bonus + deposit
  • Maximal bet: €5
  • You should get this bonus almost INSTANTLY
  • Neteller and Skrill excluded
 
Visit Casino
Last checked: 2018-06-29T00:00Z

Betspin Casino Payment methods

Betspin Casino Games

Slots
Roulette
Video poker
Bingo
Blackjack
Baccarat
Craps
Keno
Scratch cards

Betspin Casino Game providers

Top 10 trusted casinos
Lucky Creek Casino
8.7
Raging Bull Casino
8.0
WizBet Casino
9.1
Cherry Jackpot Casino
8.5
Grande Vegas Casino
8.5
Black Lotus Casino
8.8
Planet 7 Casino
7.5
CasinoMax
8.6
Jumba Bet Casino
8.7
Sloto Cash Casino
8.4