Thank you both for your replies.
Dear wailben,
A few important questions arose...
Since you have known about the casino's decision for a long time, you consider your winnings fully legitimate, and you were recommended by the AskGamblers team to submit a complaint to the regulator or ADR in early October 2023 (which you confirmed did not happen...), why you have not submitted a complaint directly to the regulator, which could have been the only way to solve your issue, please?
Since it makes no sense that you have not turned to the regulator, is there anything you have not told us about?
Is it possible you had another blocked/closed account at the casino before or have self-excluded yourself there with another account before?
Please note that even if the timer is set up for the casino, I will wait for your answers.
Dear SpinBetter Casino Team,
How could your "explanation" help us to understand what happened there? Where exactly can I find the applied rules you mentioned, please? Can you provide me a link to the casino's Terms and Conditions you referred to?
I cannot even find the rules you mentioned (2.30 and 2.32) in the casino's T&C at all, while the cited rules are under different points there. In addition, your explanation could be used against any regular player who won at SpinBetter Casino, without further clarification and supporting evidence. That does not seem to be correct or fair at all. For now, it looks like the user only took a risk and made a bet in the amount of his entire deposit in Roulette, was lucky and won, but the casino refused to pay him his legitimate winnings.
So, can you please finally provide us with a relevant explanation of the player's situation, and support it with relevant details and evidence?
What did he commit and why should the casino be unable to accept him as a player (accept his deposits/bets)? What were rules 2.30 and 2.32 about since it looks like you referred to the previous version of the casino's rules, which are not findable on the casino website anymore?
The casino has the right to refuse to accept any of the user's bets and/or close his account, but, the casino accepted his winning bet, and he won. So, if there are no other essential reasons for winnings confiscation, the casino should pay out the user's winnings in full.
Since the player can claim something and the truth could be somewhere else, only the casino can clarify the situation completely - please note if you fail to cooperate and provide the necessary clarification/details and supporting evidence, the complaint will be closed as unresolved.
If it suits you better, feel free to answer via email (branislav.b@casino.guru).
Thank you for understanding. Looking forward to hearing from you.
Thank you both for your replies.
Dear wailben,
A few important questions arose...
Since you have known about the casino's decision for a long time, you consider your winnings fully legitimate, and you were recommended by the AskGamblers team to submit a complaint to the regulator or ADR in early October 2023 (which you confirmed did not happen...), why you have not submitted a complaint directly to the regulator, which could have been the only way to solve your issue, please?
Since it makes no sense that you have not turned to the regulator, is there anything you have not told us about?
Is it possible you had another blocked/closed account at the casino before or have self-excluded yourself there with another account before?
Please note that even if the timer is set up for the casino, I will wait for your answers.
Dear SpinBetter Casino Team,
How could your "explanation" help us to understand what happened there? Where exactly can I find the applied rules you mentioned, please? Can you provide me a link to the casino's Terms and Conditions you referred to?
I cannot even find the rules you mentioned (2.30 and 2.32) in the casino's T&C at all, while the cited rules are under different points there. In addition, your explanation could be used against any regular player who won at SpinBetter Casino, without further clarification and supporting evidence. That does not seem to be correct or fair at all. For now, it looks like the user only took a risk and made a bet in the amount of his entire deposit in Roulette, was lucky and won, but the casino refused to pay him his legitimate winnings.
So, can you please finally provide us with a relevant explanation of the player's situation, and support it with relevant details and evidence?
What did he commit and why should the casino be unable to accept him as a player (accept his deposits/bets)? What were rules 2.30 and 2.32 about since it looks like you referred to the previous version of the casino's rules, which are not findable on the casino website anymore?
The casino has the right to refuse to accept any of the user's bets and/or close his account, but, the casino accepted his winning bet, and he won. So, if there are no other essential reasons for winnings confiscation, the casino should pay out the user's winnings in full.
Since the player can claim something and the truth could be somewhere else, only the casino can clarify the situation completely - please note if you fail to cooperate and provide the necessary clarification/details and supporting evidence, the complaint will be closed as unresolved.
If it suits you better, feel free to answer via email (branislav.b@casino.guru).
Thank you for understanding. Looking forward to hearing from you.