The player from Greece had requested two withdrawals totaling 950 euros and subsequently found her account had been closed. She had objected to the request of providing a complete transaction history, viewing it as a violation of her privacy. After she sent the necessary documents to the casino for verification, they were rejected without a clear explanation. The casino had required an unedited transaction history and proof of address. Despite initial confusion over whether certain transactions could be hidden, the casino had clarified they needed the full, unedited transaction history. The player had agreed to provide this, but then found her account closed again. The casino had cited a third-party funding issue, which the player disputed. We confirmed that the casino had acted within its terms and conditions when confiscating the player's winnings due to a violation of their rules. The casino had returned the player's last deposit. The complaint was rejected as the casino had operated within its terms and conditions.