Thank you, Pinnacle Casino, for providing the explanation and evidence.
After reviewing the provided evidence it became clear that david25 had in fact used strategies to gain an unfair advantage over the casino. However, the strategy the player used is easy to detect, therefore they could have been excluded from play before accumulating winnings using strategies, and requesting a withdrawal.
The correct approach, in this case, would be to let david25 keep their winnings and restrict their access to games, or their account according to the company’s policies.
All in all, we suggest the casino pay the player the confiscated winnings of $103.5.
Thank you, Pinnacle Casino, for providing the explanation and evidence.
After reviewing the provided evidence it became clear that david25 had in fact used strategies to gain an unfair advantage over the casino. However, the strategy the player used is easy to detect, therefore they could have been excluded from play before accumulating winnings using strategies, and requesting a withdrawal.
The correct approach, in this case, would be to let david25 keep their winnings and restrict their access to games, or their account according to the company’s policies.
All in all, we suggest the casino pay the player the confiscated winnings of $103.5.