Dear Thunderbolt Casino team,
Thank you for your explanation. Alright, AML rules are clear. However, allow me to please ask you a few questions.
What exact rules were applied in this case, please? Where can I find them?
Do I understand correctly that there is still an unused deposit of R250 in the player's account?
Were the bonus wagering requirements met? If yes, the maximum cashout/withdrawal rule was already applied upon winnings conversion to the withdrawable balance - why should it be a problem to deposit on top of it, or why should the bonus rules still apply?
If the withdrawal was denied and the funds were returned to the account balance, why have the winnings been confiscated?
Dear Thunderbolt Casino team,
Thank you for your explanation. Alright, AML rules are clear. However, allow me to please ask you a few questions.
What exact rules were applied in this case, please? Where can I find them?
Do I understand correctly that there is still an unused deposit of R250 in the player's account?
Were the bonus wagering requirements met? If yes, the maximum cashout/withdrawal rule was already applied upon winnings conversion to the withdrawable balance - why should it be a problem to deposit on top of it, or why should the bonus rules still apply?
If the withdrawal was denied and the funds were returned to the account balance, why have the winnings been confiscated?