Absolutely.
I have will attach the following PDF documents:
—I can’t tell if you make these documents public as part of the reporting process. Can you tell me if you do or if you keep them private? The reason I ask is that if you make them public, then I first need to redact my personal information. If you keep the documents private, then I don’t.
1. The original rejections from High Noon
2. A series of three emails that Insent to them the samE day to plead my case
3. A copy of my account history from High noon. Please note, they "accepted" the deposit.
4. A screen shot from my wallet. It is atomic wallet. It’s an app for the iPhone. It shows "confirmed" on the mail screen. If you click on the hash, ID, it shows that the deposit didn’t ultimately transmit bc it ran out of gas. I wouldn’t know that from the first screen.
this are the document. To further explain the case, I don’t dispute that the deposit "ran out of gas" so it didn’t completely transmit. That is true. What I’m saying is that I deposited around $80,000 to this casino over 6 months. I lost every penny. And all but one deposit was completely fine. There was one Eth deposit that also failed. So I have an $80,000 history of making good deposits. I’m not a scam artist that makes deposits and tries to get them rejected
As you can see from the atomic wallet screenshot, i thought the deposit was confirmed because that’s what it says.
The deposit was later failed. That same day. I didn’t know this. But I was happy to resend it immediately. In any denomination they preferred. It’s really as simple as the following analogy—if you write a check for a car and the check bounces, you can either resubmit the check or you can write a new one.
High Noon implicitly operates on credit. It’s their model, not mine, to credit accounts for wagering when the crypto hits the blockchain rather than when it has 10 confirmations. That’s their policy. Further, their own words and actions indicate that they they consider each deposit attempt and that they expect each deposit attempt to be rectified if it fails. The one other time I had and Eth failure, they insisted that I replace the crypto with another deposit. The one time out of $80,000 I deposited. This was in June. So their own actions and words demonstrate that they consider each deposit attempt valid and that I must make good on that deposit attempt. Given that, the initial crediting of my account is always credit and that credit must be fulfilled by the crypto confirming. Even if it’s not the first try. I al
happy resend the $1500 in Eth that "gassed" out, fulfilling the obligation on my alert to make the deposit. I would send that money right now. Given that, the original deposit should be in fact and there is no reason to remove my winnings.
if this was my only deposit into HN, I might have more understanding of their perspective. But it’s not. I’ve lost $80,000 to them over 6 months. They are the ones that credited my account, giving me every reason to believe that the transmission was good. They have demonstrated that even a failed deposit attempt must be rectified and the consequences of those wagers are still honored (in my case, losing previously).
I don’t dispute that the Eth timed out. What I am disputing is that this allows them to remove all $100,000 in winnings. For all the above reasons. There is no reason I could not have simply resent the Eth to fulfill the deposit agreement. I was willingly do so the second I found out it had gassed out.
also, they didn’t tell me it gassed out until I went to withdraw the next day. They let me continue to wager other money long after it gassed out. Which is a tacit indication that they considered the deposit to be good.
I realize this is wordy. I’m trying my best to give all the details of the case.
Absolutely.
I have will attach the following PDF documents:
—I can’t tell if you make these documents public as part of the reporting process. Can you tell me if you do or if you keep them private? The reason I ask is that if you make them public, then I first need to redact my personal information. If you keep the documents private, then I don’t.
1. The original rejections from High Noon
2. A series of three emails that Insent to them the samE day to plead my case
3. A copy of my account history from High noon. Please note, they "accepted" the deposit.
4. A screen shot from my wallet. It is atomic wallet. It’s an app for the iPhone. It shows "confirmed" on the mail screen. If you click on the hash, ID, it shows that the deposit didn’t ultimately transmit bc it ran out of gas. I wouldn’t know that from the first screen.
this are the document. To further explain the case, I don’t dispute that the deposit "ran out of gas" so it didn’t completely transmit. That is true. What I’m saying is that I deposited around $80,000 to this casino over 6 months. I lost every penny. And all but one deposit was completely fine. There was one Eth deposit that also failed. So I have an $80,000 history of making good deposits. I’m not a scam artist that makes deposits and tries to get them rejected
As you can see from the atomic wallet screenshot, i thought the deposit was confirmed because that’s what it says.
The deposit was later failed. That same day. I didn’t know this. But I was happy to resend it immediately. In any denomination they preferred. It’s really as simple as the following analogy—if you write a check for a car and the check bounces, you can either resubmit the check or you can write a new one.
High Noon implicitly operates on credit. It’s their model, not mine, to credit accounts for wagering when the crypto hits the blockchain rather than when it has 10 confirmations. That’s their policy. Further, their own words and actions indicate that they they consider each deposit attempt and that they expect each deposit attempt to be rectified if it fails. The one other time I had and Eth failure, they insisted that I replace the crypto with another deposit. The one time out of $80,000 I deposited. This was in June. So their own actions and words demonstrate that they consider each deposit attempt valid and that I must make good on that deposit attempt. Given that, the initial crediting of my account is always credit and that credit must be fulfilled by the crypto confirming. Even if it’s not the first try. I al
happy resend the $1500 in Eth that "gassed" out, fulfilling the obligation on my alert to make the deposit. I would send that money right now. Given that, the original deposit should be in fact and there is no reason to remove my winnings.
if this was my only deposit into HN, I might have more understanding of their perspective. But it’s not. I’ve lost $80,000 to them over 6 months. They are the ones that credited my account, giving me every reason to believe that the transmission was good. They have demonstrated that even a failed deposit attempt must be rectified and the consequences of those wagers are still honored (in my case, losing previously).
I don’t dispute that the Eth timed out. What I am disputing is that this allows them to remove all $100,000 in winnings. For all the above reasons. There is no reason I could not have simply resent the Eth to fulfill the deposit agreement. I was willingly do so the second I found out it had gassed out.
also, they didn’t tell me it gassed out until I went to withdraw the next day. They let me continue to wager other money long after it gassed out. Which is a tacit indication that they considered the deposit to be good.
I realize this is wordy. I’m trying my best to give all the details of the case.