Hello, Mauri181,
I am sorry to hear about your trouble. From now on, I will assist you with the case.
Before I invite the casino to the thread, I would like to ask you a few questions to clarify the situation and explain to you what I can see here because, to be honest, it looks like I will not have to invite the casino representative here at all.
Are you sure that you used only one no-deposit bonus before your first real money deposit?
This is the screenshot you provided upon submitting the complaint:
It is of very bad quality, unclear and not fully readable, but I can see a few important things there, which basically confirms that you played with more than 1 no-deposit bonus in a row without making a deposit. There is no deposit before the no-deposit bonus thanks to which you accumulated your disputed winnings. I can see another no-deposit bonus (bonus code) there.
In this type of casino, there is only one row in the transaction history in case you use a bonus code ("redeemed" or "denied"), and 2 rows when there is a "Free Spin Deposit" operation ("Requested" and the second row with a result) - both cases mean free money, no-deposit bonus.
From the bottom of your screenshot, although there were 2 denied bonus codes, I can see the third bonus code was redeemed, so it was successfully used. Only then you claimed the no-deposit bonus ("Free Spin Deposit") that you managed to turn into the disputed winnings.
This is the rule from the casino's Terms and Conditions (available HERE, section RULES - NO DEPOSIT BONUSES (FREE CHIPS, FREE SPINS)):
"15. The player is entitled to only one free chip in between deposits; any winnings resulting from multiple free chips will be void. For example, should a player redeem two free chips in a row, he/she will not be able to withdraw any winnings generated by playing on said chip."
I would ask you for a better screenshot, but I think it is not necessary since the essential information is possible to see there.
To be honest, from the provided screenshot of your transaction history, I can see you did not comply with the casino's bonus rules governing no-deposit bonuses, and our attitude is that we accept such rules and their applying if we are talking about no-deposit bonuses. In addition, as you yourself confirmed above, your deposit was returned to your payment method - a standard process in these casinos if you made it only to verify your payment method and withdraw (invalid) winnings from the casino. The casino confiscated only your illegitimate winnings and refunded your deposit, so there are no obligations towards you, and I really cannot see any issue here.
So, can you please confirm the above-stated, and I can close the case, or would you like me to ask the casino for the details anyway?
Please note if you really used another bonus code before your successful no-deposit bonus, the only thing I would ask the casino for is to provide me with a more detailed transaction history, which would confirm it (more details of playing with it), and it would be a waste of time for all parties involved.
Looking forward to hearing from you.
Hello, Mauri181,
I am sorry to hear about your trouble. From now on, I will assist you with the case.
Before I invite the casino to the thread, I would like to ask you a few questions to clarify the situation and explain to you what I can see here because, to be honest, it looks like I will not have to invite the casino representative here at all.
Are you sure that you used only one no-deposit bonus before your first real money deposit?
This is the screenshot you provided upon submitting the complaint:
It is of very bad quality, unclear and not fully readable, but I can see a few important things there, which basically confirms that you played with more than 1 no-deposit bonus in a row without making a deposit. There is no deposit before the no-deposit bonus thanks to which you accumulated your disputed winnings. I can see another no-deposit bonus (bonus code) there.
In this type of casino, there is only one row in the transaction history in case you use a bonus code ("redeemed" or "denied"), and 2 rows when there is a "Free Spin Deposit" operation ("Requested" and the second row with a result) - both cases mean free money, no-deposit bonus.
From the bottom of your screenshot, although there were 2 denied bonus codes, I can see the third bonus code was redeemed, so it was successfully used. Only then you claimed the no-deposit bonus ("Free Spin Deposit") that you managed to turn into the disputed winnings.
This is the rule from the casino's Terms and Conditions (available HERE, section RULES - NO DEPOSIT BONUSES (FREE CHIPS, FREE SPINS)):
"15. The player is entitled to only one free chip in between deposits; any winnings resulting from multiple free chips will be void. For example, should a player redeem two free chips in a row, he/she will not be able to withdraw any winnings generated by playing on said chip."
I would ask you for a better screenshot, but I think it is not necessary since the essential information is possible to see there.
To be honest, from the provided screenshot of your transaction history, I can see you did not comply with the casino's bonus rules governing no-deposit bonuses, and our attitude is that we accept such rules and their applying if we are talking about no-deposit bonuses. In addition, as you yourself confirmed above, your deposit was returned to your payment method - a standard process in these casinos if you made it only to verify your payment method and withdraw (invalid) winnings from the casino. The casino confiscated only your illegitimate winnings and refunded your deposit, so there are no obligations towards you, and I really cannot see any issue here.
So, can you please confirm the above-stated, and I can close the case, or would you like me to ask the casino for the details anyway?
Please note if you really used another bonus code before your successful no-deposit bonus, the only thing I would ask the casino for is to provide me with a more detailed transaction history, which would confirm it (more details of playing with it), and it would be a waste of time for all parties involved.
Looking forward to hearing from you.