I am sorry, but I honestly don't understand how a casino setting a maximum allowed bet means that the bonus terms are rigged. This is a standard rule and many casinos apply it to their bonuses. It is the players' responsibility to read the bonus terms before they activate a bonus and start playing. If this rule has been breached repeatedly, we believe that the casino has the full right to confiscate their winnings.
Furthermore, if the complaint was closed as "Player stopped responding" it is because, well, the player stopped responding. I don't see any disadvantage to players or real benefit to casinos with this classification. It is solely in the player's hands if they want to continue working on the complaint or not. We never close complaints as "Player stopped responding" if the player is actively participating in the process.
Lastly, if you are honestly interested in how we review online casinos, please feel free to read the following article: https://casino.guru/our-casino-reviews. Our reviews and casino ratings are not based on one person's experience but on thorough research.
Since it seems that you are no longer interested in our help, this complaint will now be rejected. Thank you for your understanding, I am sorry we could not be of more help on this occasion, and I wish you all the best with the other mediator you contacted.
If you receive the game history and you still believe that the casino made a mistake, feel free to forward it to me for further evaluation with the possibility to reopen the complaint.
I am sorry, but I honestly don't understand how a casino setting a maximum allowed bet means that the bonus terms are rigged. This is a standard rule and many casinos apply it to their bonuses. It is the players' responsibility to read the bonus terms before they activate a bonus and start playing. If this rule has been breached repeatedly, we believe that the casino has the full right to confiscate their winnings.
Furthermore, if the complaint was closed as "Player stopped responding" it is because, well, the player stopped responding. I don't see any disadvantage to players or real benefit to casinos with this classification. It is solely in the player's hands if they want to continue working on the complaint or not. We never close complaints as "Player stopped responding" if the player is actively participating in the process.
Lastly, if you are honestly interested in how we review online casinos, please feel free to read the following article: https://casino.guru/our-casino-reviews. Our reviews and casino ratings are not based on one person's experience but on thorough research.
Since it seems that you are no longer interested in our help, this complaint will now be rejected. Thank you for your understanding, I am sorry we could not be of more help on this occasion, and I wish you all the best with the other mediator you contacted.
If you receive the game history and you still believe that the casino made a mistake, feel free to forward it to me for further evaluation with the possibility to reopen the complaint.