Michal. Thank you for your response and for pointing out the Terms and Conditions of LOKI Casino.
I understand the importance of personal responsibility in ensuring compliance with the gambling laws of one's jurisdiction, as stated in the Terms and Conditions of LOKI Casino. However, it's critical to clarify that these terms do not, and cannot, override or negate the prevailing laws of any jurisdiction, including Malta.
The legal framework in Malta clearly mandates that any entity offering gambling services to Maltese residents must possess a valid license issued by the Malta Gaming Authority (MGA). This requirement is in place to protect consumers and ensure fair and transparent gaming practices. Operating without such a license, especially without implementing a geographical restriction mechanism (GEO blocker), is not just a breach of the MGA's regulations but also constitutes a legal offense under Maltese law.
While I appreciate the emphasis the terms place on player responsibility, the absence of a GEO blocker exposes Maltese residents to services that are not legally permitted within our jurisdiction. This oversight not only places the onus on individuals, often unaware of such legal intricacies, but also undermines the regulatory framework established for their protection.
Here a bit of law, which applies to the situation with LokiCasino.com
The casino and the customer entered into a mutual agreement whereby the customer accepted the Terms and Conditions upon registration. This contract constitutes the entire basis for gaming activities and transactions at the casino or with the bookmaker. Given that the online casino and sports betting offerings were illegal and unlicensed, it follows that the contract between the casino and the customer is void under Section 134 of the German Civil Code (BGB).
According to Section 134 BGB, a legal transaction that violates a statutory prohibition is null and void. The same would apply, for example, to a sales contract for illegal narcotics. In this case, the transaction would contravene the Narcotics Act, while the contract for gaming activities violates the State Treaty on Gambling. Consequently, there was no legal basis for the customer's deposits.
Pursuant to Section 812 (1) sentence 1 of the BGB, one is obligated to return what has been received without legal basis, i.e., without a valid contract. This is also the basis on which customers can reclaim their gambling losses.
Furthermore, it is noteworthy that no court has hitherto required that the Terms and Conditions be read thoroughly. Rather, it is acknowledged by the courts that typically, such terms are merely skimmed and accepted without detailed review.
In Maltese law, equivalent provisions to those in the German Civil Code (BGB) can be found that deal with the nullity of contracts made in violation of the law and the restitution of benefits gained without a legal basis.
Void Contracts Due to Illegality: Similar to Section 134 of the German BGB, under Maltese law, contracts that are entered into which contravene statutory prohibitions or public policy are considered null and void. This principle is upheld in various statutes concerning specific matters such as gaming and betting, and it is rooted in the broader principles of contract law found within the Civil Code of Malta.
Restitution for Invalid Contracts: Corresponding to Section 812 of the BGB, Maltese law also provides mechanisms for restitution in cases where a contract is found to be void or rescinded. Under Maltese contract law, particularly through provisions in the Civil Code, any benefits transferred under a contract that is later declared void must be returned. This is founded on the principle that no one should benefit unjustly at the expense of another, commonly referred to in legal terms as "unjust enrichment."
In terms of specific legislation, Malta has comprehensive laws regulating gaming and betting, including the Gaming Act and regulations issued under it, which define the legal framework for gambling activities. If a gaming or betting operation is found to be unlicensed and illegal, any contracts made under such operations are to be considered void ab initio (void from the outset). Furthermore, participants who have incurred losses under such illegal contracts have the right to recover such losses based on the principles of restitution for unjust enrichment.
Michal. Thank you for your response and for pointing out the Terms and Conditions of LOKI Casino.
I understand the importance of personal responsibility in ensuring compliance with the gambling laws of one's jurisdiction, as stated in the Terms and Conditions of LOKI Casino. However, it's critical to clarify that these terms do not, and cannot, override or negate the prevailing laws of any jurisdiction, including Malta.
The legal framework in Malta clearly mandates that any entity offering gambling services to Maltese residents must possess a valid license issued by the Malta Gaming Authority (MGA). This requirement is in place to protect consumers and ensure fair and transparent gaming practices. Operating without such a license, especially without implementing a geographical restriction mechanism (GEO blocker), is not just a breach of the MGA's regulations but also constitutes a legal offense under Maltese law.
While I appreciate the emphasis the terms place on player responsibility, the absence of a GEO blocker exposes Maltese residents to services that are not legally permitted within our jurisdiction. This oversight not only places the onus on individuals, often unaware of such legal intricacies, but also undermines the regulatory framework established for their protection.
Here a bit of law, which applies to the situation with LokiCasino.com
The casino and the customer entered into a mutual agreement whereby the customer accepted the Terms and Conditions upon registration. This contract constitutes the entire basis for gaming activities and transactions at the casino or with the bookmaker. Given that the online casino and sports betting offerings were illegal and unlicensed, it follows that the contract between the casino and the customer is void under Section 134 of the German Civil Code (BGB).
According to Section 134 BGB, a legal transaction that violates a statutory prohibition is null and void. The same would apply, for example, to a sales contract for illegal narcotics. In this case, the transaction would contravene the Narcotics Act, while the contract for gaming activities violates the State Treaty on Gambling. Consequently, there was no legal basis for the customer's deposits.
Pursuant to Section 812 (1) sentence 1 of the BGB, one is obligated to return what has been received without legal basis, i.e., without a valid contract. This is also the basis on which customers can reclaim their gambling losses.
Furthermore, it is noteworthy that no court has hitherto required that the Terms and Conditions be read thoroughly. Rather, it is acknowledged by the courts that typically, such terms are merely skimmed and accepted without detailed review.
In Maltese law, equivalent provisions to those in the German Civil Code (BGB) can be found that deal with the nullity of contracts made in violation of the law and the restitution of benefits gained without a legal basis.
Void Contracts Due to Illegality: Similar to Section 134 of the German BGB, under Maltese law, contracts that are entered into which contravene statutory prohibitions or public policy are considered null and void. This principle is upheld in various statutes concerning specific matters such as gaming and betting, and it is rooted in the broader principles of contract law found within the Civil Code of Malta.
Restitution for Invalid Contracts: Corresponding to Section 812 of the BGB, Maltese law also provides mechanisms for restitution in cases where a contract is found to be void or rescinded. Under Maltese contract law, particularly through provisions in the Civil Code, any benefits transferred under a contract that is later declared void must be returned. This is founded on the principle that no one should benefit unjustly at the expense of another, commonly referred to in legal terms as "unjust enrichment."
In terms of specific legislation, Malta has comprehensive laws regulating gaming and betting, including the Gaming Act and regulations issued under it, which define the legal framework for gambling activities. If a gaming or betting operation is found to be unlicensed and illegal, any contracts made under such operations are to be considered void ab initio (void from the outset). Furthermore, participants who have incurred losses under such illegal contracts have the right to recover such losses based on the principles of restitution for unjust enrichment.