The player from Germany had deposited 1500 Euros in Joo Casino, won 12,350 Euros, but encountered difficulties when he tried to withdraw his winnings. Despite providing all necessary verification documents, he had been persistently informed that the verification process was ongoing with an unknown completion time. His initial deposit had been returned. The player claimed that the casino had returned his deposit without his request, which had raised his suspicion. The casino, however, had stated that the deposits made by the player were returned due to issues with the payment provider, over which they had no control. The Complaints Team had tried to mediate the situation by requesting more information and evidence from both sides. It came to light that the payments had failed due to some missing transaction identification details that were required for regulatory reasons, and seems the player's bank would be responsible for this. Consequently, the Complaints Team concluded that the casino had acted in accordance with its terms and conditions since the payments had not been received by the casino, and the complaint was rejected..