Dear ICE casino representative and mariusztatra,
We strive to assess cases like this independently, recognizing the importance of players not creating multiple accounts. However, we differentiate between a player creating additional accounts solely to leverage bonuses and doing so for legitimate reasons, such as in the case of mariusztatra.
In this instance, we believe that mariusztatra created a second account due to relocating to another country, unaware that it was prohibited, and without seeking support.
We are confident that he now understands the error of his actions. Importantly, the second account was created without malicious intent and in good faith.
Our reasoning is as follows:
If both accounts were used simultaneously, the casino actions are justified.
If the first account was abandoned and a second account was created with no activity in the first, this case should be considered independently.
Given that the casino incurs expenses for each bonus, it is unfair for mariusztatra to benefit from the same bonuses on both accounts.
If the winnings are from same bonus claimed before in the PLN account, the casino is within its rights to withhold payment.
Should the winnings stem from real money, the casino should pay the winnings minus the expenses on bonuses claimed a second time.
If the winnings are from a bonus claimed only once in a NOK account, it would be nice to find a compromise.
Now, imagine the idea that mariusztatra would be playing in the casino for 10 years and depositing a total amount of €1 million. Would it be fair to mariusztatra to spend such a large sum of money with a 0% chance of winning anything?
Dear ICE casino representative and mariusztatra,
We strive to assess cases like this independently, recognizing the importance of players not creating multiple accounts. However, we differentiate between a player creating additional accounts solely to leverage bonuses and doing so for legitimate reasons, such as in the case of mariusztatra.
In this instance, we believe that mariusztatra created a second account due to relocating to another country, unaware that it was prohibited, and without seeking support.
We are confident that he now understands the error of his actions. Importantly, the second account was created without malicious intent and in good faith.
Our reasoning is as follows:
If both accounts were used simultaneously, the casino actions are justified.
If the first account was abandoned and a second account was created with no activity in the first, this case should be considered independently.
Given that the casino incurs expenses for each bonus, it is unfair for mariusztatra to benefit from the same bonuses on both accounts.
If the winnings are from same bonus claimed before in the PLN account, the casino is within its rights to withhold payment.
Should the winnings stem from real money, the casino should pay the winnings minus the expenses on bonuses claimed a second time.
If the winnings are from a bonus claimed only once in a NOK account, it would be nice to find a compromise.
Now, imagine the idea that mariusztatra would be playing in the casino for 10 years and depositing a total amount of €1 million. Would it be fair to mariusztatra to spend such a large sum of money with a 0% chance of winning anything?