Greetings all,
I am sorry for the further delay. I will try to improve on it.
Thank you, SergeySm, for your emails and additional clarification. Although there are a few discrepancies, after consultation with my superior, we are basically at the same point anyway. So, there is no other option than to find out more from the casino, as I asked for some time ago.
Dear Fairspin Casino Team,
Thank you, too, for your email and additional information. However, there was nothing relevant to the case or anything that could change our reconsidered decision.
I will try to explain it and be as clear as possible.
You mentioned that you have provided us with enough information and evidence on the case supporting that the player had violated the casino's T&Cs - yes, I completely agree. But, we consider such rules and reasons to confiscate players' winnings unfair, and we do not accept their use unless there are other justified reasons that I asked you earlier.
Therefore, we would need additional details/evidence regarding the player's (players') activity or to see some examples, where it is clear that the player did not play on his own, using his knowledge exclusively, but also used any tool/software/app to gain an unfair advantage. Alternatively, and since it was not a problem before he mentioned another user himself - an explanation of an (unfair) advantage that he/they could gain by playing in this way, even if there was any connection between the accounts.
For example, the most important thing, since it was not clear from the evidence we received so far, we would like to see situations where it is visible that the player could not have played such rounds on his own, without any "additional help" in form of the above-mentioned tool/SW/app/etc., such as jumping between tables in short periods while only collecting sure winnings, or such action on several tables at the same time, etc.
Also, if there is really evidence confirming a connection between those accounts (besides random rounds that they could have participated in by coincidence), it would be highly appreciated if you could share it with me.
Alternatively, would it be possible to ask the game provider to review the matter while taking both/all allegedly linked accounts into consideration and informing us about the outcome?
Feel free to send the requested details to my email address as usual (branislav.b@casino.guru).
Please note if there are no such proofs, we would recommend the casino restore the player's account to the state before its closure and winnings confiscation, or in case of permanent closure, pay out the disputed winnings/remaining balance.
Looking forward to hearing from you.
Greetings all,
I am sorry for the further delay. I will try to improve on it.
Thank you, SergeySm, for your emails and additional clarification. Although there are a few discrepancies, after consultation with my superior, we are basically at the same point anyway. So, there is no other option than to find out more from the casino, as I asked for some time ago.
Dear Fairspin Casino Team,
Thank you, too, for your email and additional information. However, there was nothing relevant to the case or anything that could change our reconsidered decision.
I will try to explain it and be as clear as possible.
You mentioned that you have provided us with enough information and evidence on the case supporting that the player had violated the casino's T&Cs - yes, I completely agree. But, we consider such rules and reasons to confiscate players' winnings unfair, and we do not accept their use unless there are other justified reasons that I asked you earlier.
Therefore, we would need additional details/evidence regarding the player's (players') activity or to see some examples, where it is clear that the player did not play on his own, using his knowledge exclusively, but also used any tool/software/app to gain an unfair advantage. Alternatively, and since it was not a problem before he mentioned another user himself - an explanation of an (unfair) advantage that he/they could gain by playing in this way, even if there was any connection between the accounts.
For example, the most important thing, since it was not clear from the evidence we received so far, we would like to see situations where it is visible that the player could not have played such rounds on his own, without any "additional help" in form of the above-mentioned tool/SW/app/etc., such as jumping between tables in short periods while only collecting sure winnings, or such action on several tables at the same time, etc.
Also, if there is really evidence confirming a connection between those accounts (besides random rounds that they could have participated in by coincidence), it would be highly appreciated if you could share it with me.
Alternatively, would it be possible to ask the game provider to review the matter while taking both/all allegedly linked accounts into consideration and informing us about the outcome?
Feel free to send the requested details to my email address as usual (branislav.b@casino.guru).
Please note if there are no such proofs, we would recommend the casino restore the player's account to the state before its closure and winnings confiscation, or in case of permanent closure, pay out the disputed winnings/remaining balance.
Looking forward to hearing from you.
Edited by a Casino Guru admin