Greetings all,
I am sorry for the delay.
I already know what is going on here. 'No rules' are not so important in this case, jonnotron. It is about the casino's general bonus rules and their application.
Dear Thomas and Brango Casino,
Thank you for your email and the provided data.
Although all actions were conducted in accordance with the casino's terms, as you mentioned, I am afraid those rules are not completely clear to a regular player. Even there are contradictory parts.
To be honest, I remember I had several cases in the past regarding similar issues, and we even had a video call with representatives of Brango Casino and its other sister casinos. We made a deal that the casino should have implemented pop-ups once players fall under 1 $/€, which, if I remember correctly, was done. We made this deal exactly because of the rule applied in this case and its misleading/unclear wording. The pop-up should inform players about further options/actions to not fall into a "trap" of never-ending bonus rules application. Although it was related to the situation when a balance is under 1 $/€, I can see a similar situation here.
Therefore, I have a few additional questions to clarify the situation.
Is there also a pop-up informing players about possible future actions after wagering requirements are met?
The bonuses are usually ended by meeting the wagering requirements or a withdrawal request. If the user met the wagering requirements of the bonus in question and did not breach any other rules, why should the bonus rules still apply to his balance, which was converted to his real money (withdrawable) balance? Do I understand correctly that at that point (meeting the wagering requirements), he was allowed to withdraw his available balance? If yes and it is still like in the past - was he supposed to withdraw his funds right after meeting the wagering requirements and deposit them back to the account to continue playing?
If so, what is the difference between continuing playing and withdrawing and subsequently depositing these winnings back into the account so he can play?
If the casino wants to apply bonus rules and restrictions after the bonus wagering requirements are met, it should be also able to enforce it by its system/SW as it is during a play with an active bonus, or, at least the players should be somehow clearly informed about these facts and rules (for example, by a pop-up) since we are talking rather about specific rules that are not common in the industry.
How can a player find out - besides a bit unclear general bonus rule(s) - that his real money (withdrawable) balance needs to be withdrawn and deposited back to continue playing?
Or, was it a sticky bonus? Only that could significantly change the situation.
Greetings all,
I am sorry for the delay.
I already know what is going on here. 'No rules' are not so important in this case, jonnotron. It is about the casino's general bonus rules and their application.
Dear Thomas and Brango Casino,
Thank you for your email and the provided data.
Although all actions were conducted in accordance with the casino's terms, as you mentioned, I am afraid those rules are not completely clear to a regular player. Even there are contradictory parts.
To be honest, I remember I had several cases in the past regarding similar issues, and we even had a video call with representatives of Brango Casino and its other sister casinos. We made a deal that the casino should have implemented pop-ups once players fall under 1 $/€, which, if I remember correctly, was done. We made this deal exactly because of the rule applied in this case and its misleading/unclear wording. The pop-up should inform players about further options/actions to not fall into a "trap" of never-ending bonus rules application. Although it was related to the situation when a balance is under 1 $/€, I can see a similar situation here.
Therefore, I have a few additional questions to clarify the situation.
Is there also a pop-up informing players about possible future actions after wagering requirements are met?
The bonuses are usually ended by meeting the wagering requirements or a withdrawal request. If the user met the wagering requirements of the bonus in question and did not breach any other rules, why should the bonus rules still apply to his balance, which was converted to his real money (withdrawable) balance? Do I understand correctly that at that point (meeting the wagering requirements), he was allowed to withdraw his available balance? If yes and it is still like in the past - was he supposed to withdraw his funds right after meeting the wagering requirements and deposit them back to the account to continue playing?
If so, what is the difference between continuing playing and withdrawing and subsequently depositing these winnings back into the account so he can play?
If the casino wants to apply bonus rules and restrictions after the bonus wagering requirements are met, it should be also able to enforce it by its system/SW as it is during a play with an active bonus, or, at least the players should be somehow clearly informed about these facts and rules (for example, by a pop-up) since we are talking rather about specific rules that are not common in the industry.
How can a player find out - besides a bit unclear general bonus rule(s) - that his real money (withdrawable) balance needs to be withdrawn and deposited back to continue playing?
Or, was it a sticky bonus? Only that could significantly change the situation.
Edited by a Casino Guru admin