Dear Bettilt Casino,
Firstly, at Casino Guru, we uphold fairness in gaming practices, and we firmly believe that low-risk play on roulette does not grant players an unfair advantage over the casino. Even if a player covers the entire roulette table, the payouts for winning are insufficient to overcome the inherent house edge, which remains regardless of any strategy employed. This edge, inherent in the game's design, cannot be eliminated by any means.
Furthermore, even though low-risk strategies may afford players higher winning probabilities, the associated payouts are notably lower. Regardless of consistent short-term wins, the payout ratios are meticulously calibrated to ensure the casino's profitability over time. While low-risk strategies may indeed assist players in managing their bankrolls more effectively and enjoying extended playing sessions, they do not ensure long-term profitability. In the long run, the house edge inevitably leads to player losses, albeit at a slower rate compared to riskier bets.
In essence, low-risk play in roulette is not unfairly penalized by casinos. The game is structured to favor the house, regardless of the player's chosen strategy.
Secondly I'd like to address the presence of two sets of Terms and Conditions on our site, particularly in the registration form, as depicted in the image provided below. When users click the first link, a pop-up banner appears, displaying the current Terms and Conditions. However, if they opt to download the terms by clicking the "download" arrow, they are directed to a PDF version of the Terms and Conditions hosted at https://s3.bttmedia.com/hub/b3/files/TermsAndConditions-EN-IN.pdf. This setup raises concerns regarding consistency and clarity for users.
Specifically, Rule 7.4, which has sparked our current discussion, is notably absent from the PDF version of the Terms and Conditions. This discrepancy raises questions about which set of terms users are actually agreeing to. It's crucial for users to have access to clear, consistent, and up-to-date Terms and Conditions to ensure transparency and fairness in their interactions with your platform.
Therefore, we recognize the need to address this issue promptly to avoid any confusion or ambiguity for our users. We will take steps to ensure that both sets of Terms and Conditions are aligned and accurately reflect the rules and regulations governing your platform.
I respectfully request a reconsideration of your decision in this matter, as I firmly believe that the player is entitled to receive their winnings in full. The circumstances outlined provide compelling reasons for this request, and I trust that upon review, you will recognize the validity of our position.
Thank you for your attention to this matter.
Best Regards,
Jakub
Dear Bettilt Casino,
Firstly, at Casino Guru, we uphold fairness in gaming practices, and we firmly believe that low-risk play on roulette does not grant players an unfair advantage over the casino. Even if a player covers the entire roulette table, the payouts for winning are insufficient to overcome the inherent house edge, which remains regardless of any strategy employed. This edge, inherent in the game's design, cannot be eliminated by any means.
Furthermore, even though low-risk strategies may afford players higher winning probabilities, the associated payouts are notably lower. Regardless of consistent short-term wins, the payout ratios are meticulously calibrated to ensure the casino's profitability over time. While low-risk strategies may indeed assist players in managing their bankrolls more effectively and enjoying extended playing sessions, they do not ensure long-term profitability. In the long run, the house edge inevitably leads to player losses, albeit at a slower rate compared to riskier bets.
In essence, low-risk play in roulette is not unfairly penalized by casinos. The game is structured to favor the house, regardless of the player's chosen strategy.
Secondly I'd like to address the presence of two sets of Terms and Conditions on our site, particularly in the registration form, as depicted in the image provided below. When users click the first link, a pop-up banner appears, displaying the current Terms and Conditions. However, if they opt to download the terms by clicking the "download" arrow, they are directed to a PDF version of the Terms and Conditions hosted at https://s3.bttmedia.com/hub/b3/files/TermsAndConditions-EN-IN.pdf. This setup raises concerns regarding consistency and clarity for users.
Specifically, Rule 7.4, which has sparked our current discussion, is notably absent from the PDF version of the Terms and Conditions. This discrepancy raises questions about which set of terms users are actually agreeing to. It's crucial for users to have access to clear, consistent, and up-to-date Terms and Conditions to ensure transparency and fairness in their interactions with your platform.
Therefore, we recognize the need to address this issue promptly to avoid any confusion or ambiguity for our users. We will take steps to ensure that both sets of Terms and Conditions are aligned and accurately reflect the rules and regulations governing your platform.
I respectfully request a reconsideration of your decision in this matter, as I firmly believe that the player is entitled to receive their winnings in full. The circumstances outlined provide compelling reasons for this request, and I trust that upon review, you will recognize the validity of our position.
Thank you for your attention to this matter.
Best Regards,
Jakub