This entire thread has been manipulated by a scheming player. There was no "casino mistake". There was a maintenance with our depositing crediting system. We kindly credited this player manually with his deposit, with the intention of removing it once the maintenance ended, and the deposit credited through the system. The only mistake we made was to trust a player, who ended up stealing from us the first chance he got.
The player spent our manual credit on losing bets. When the actual deposit credited, he noticed before we could remove it, and used our money to place a bet. Had the bet won, the obvious decision would be to void the winnings and remove the original bet amount, which belonged to us. But the bet lost.
As an industry, we cannot say that the funds used to place a bet with stolen money are only removed if the bet wins. That gives the player a no risk situation, where he knows if he loses the bet, there is no consequence. When a player loses a bet, he loses that money. If the money he placed the bet with is our money, he owes us that money.
If we are unable to remove the stolen funds from a player account, after he places a bet with them and loses, it puts him in a no-risk situation. He cannot lose, because the money he placed the bet with was not his. He can only win, if the bet wins and we don't notice that it was placed with stolen funds. That is why a similar rule to ours exists on every casino/sportsbook.
This entire thread has been manipulated by a scheming player. There was no "casino mistake". There was a maintenance with our depositing crediting system. We kindly credited this player manually with his deposit, with the intention of removing it once the maintenance ended, and the deposit credited through the system. The only mistake we made was to trust a player, who ended up stealing from us the first chance he got.
The player spent our manual credit on losing bets. When the actual deposit credited, he noticed before we could remove it, and used our money to place a bet. Had the bet won, the obvious decision would be to void the winnings and remove the original bet amount, which belonged to us. But the bet lost.
As an industry, we cannot say that the funds used to place a bet with stolen money are only removed if the bet wins. That gives the player a no risk situation, where he knows if he loses the bet, there is no consequence. When a player loses a bet, he loses that money. If the money he placed the bet with is our money, he owes us that money.
If we are unable to remove the stolen funds from a player account, after he places a bet with them and loses, it puts him in a no-risk situation. He cannot lose, because the money he placed the bet with was not his. He can only win, if the bet wins and we don't notice that it was placed with stolen funds. That is why a similar rule to ours exists on every casino/sportsbook.