Dear kailikaljund7,
I have just received the message from the casino, which includes the requested evidence. The screenshots from the casino’s system do show two accounts with matching addresses and, in some cases, matching IP addresses. However, I do not consider this to be sufficient proof of the creation of multiple accounts.
I understand how frustrating this situation must be for you, and I want to assure you that I am working diligently to resolve this matter. Rest assured, I will keep you updated as soon as I receive any new information.
Please know that I am committed to ensuring that your concerns are taken seriously and that a fair solution is reached. I appreciate your patience and understanding while we await the casino’s reply. If you have any further questions or additional information to provide, feel free to reach out, and I will be happy to assist.
Dear Talismania Casino,
As previously mentioned, a simple match of addresses and IP addresses is not enough to conclusively claim that the player has created multiple accounts. It is common for multiple individuals to live at the same address, meaning the address could be identical, and they may also share the same IP address. Additionally, the player claims she has moved to a different address and has proof of this. This should not be the basis for confiscating her winnings under any circumstances.
The player also asserts that her account was fully verified. Is this correct? On the screenshot of the second account, there appears to be no KYC record. Was the second player asked to undergo the verification process?
For the reasons outlined above, I must maintain that the creation of multiple accounts has not been proven to a sufficient degree. As such, the player should be entitled to a refund of her balance. In the interest of fairness and transparency, I would recommend that you re-conduct the verification process for both accounts to fully investigate the matter and determine the actual circumstances.
It is important to reiterate that the player is entitled to their funds unless there is conclusive evidence of multiple account creation or any other breach of the casino's terms. A fair and thorough verification process is crucial in such matters to avoid unfairly penalizing players who have complied with the rules.
To facilitate a fair resolution for both parties, I encourage open communication and would be happy to assist in any way possible in clarifying any further questions or doubts you may have. We aim to find a transparent and just resolution that protects both the casino's interests and the player's rights.
Thank you for your cooperation and I look forward to your response.
Dear kailikaljund7,
I have just received the message from the casino, which includes the requested evidence. The screenshots from the casino’s system do show two accounts with matching addresses and, in some cases, matching IP addresses. However, I do not consider this to be sufficient proof of the creation of multiple accounts.
I understand how frustrating this situation must be for you, and I want to assure you that I am working diligently to resolve this matter. Rest assured, I will keep you updated as soon as I receive any new information.
Please know that I am committed to ensuring that your concerns are taken seriously and that a fair solution is reached. I appreciate your patience and understanding while we await the casino’s reply. If you have any further questions or additional information to provide, feel free to reach out, and I will be happy to assist.
Dear Talismania Casino,
As previously mentioned, a simple match of addresses and IP addresses is not enough to conclusively claim that the player has created multiple accounts. It is common for multiple individuals to live at the same address, meaning the address could be identical, and they may also share the same IP address. Additionally, the player claims she has moved to a different address and has proof of this. This should not be the basis for confiscating her winnings under any circumstances.
The player also asserts that her account was fully verified. Is this correct? On the screenshot of the second account, there appears to be no KYC record. Was the second player asked to undergo the verification process?
For the reasons outlined above, I must maintain that the creation of multiple accounts has not been proven to a sufficient degree. As such, the player should be entitled to a refund of her balance. In the interest of fairness and transparency, I would recommend that you re-conduct the verification process for both accounts to fully investigate the matter and determine the actual circumstances.
It is important to reiterate that the player is entitled to their funds unless there is conclusive evidence of multiple account creation or any other breach of the casino's terms. A fair and thorough verification process is crucial in such matters to avoid unfairly penalizing players who have complied with the rules.
To facilitate a fair resolution for both parties, I encourage open communication and would be happy to assist in any way possible in clarifying any further questions or doubts you may have. We aim to find a transparent and just resolution that protects both the casino's interests and the player's rights.
Thank you for your cooperation and I look forward to your response.
Edited by a Casino Guru admin