The player from Finland, who had self-excluded from Nucleonbet, was able to open an account with Nords Casino, which was operated by the same group. Despite MGA guidelines having stated that self-exclusion should have applied across all brands, the casino had refused to void the player's bets and refund deposits. The player had provided proof of self-exclusion and recent deposits at Nords Casino. We had reached out to the casino for a response, but they had failed to reply. As a result, we were unable to proceed with the investigation and the complaint was classified as 'unresolved'.
The player from Finland, who had self-excluded from Nucleonbet, was able to open an account with Nords Casino, which was operated by the same group. Despite MGA guidelines having stated that self-exclusion should have applied across all brands, the casino had refused to void the player's bets and refund deposits. The player had provided proof of self-exclusion and recent deposits at Nords Casino. We had reached out to the casino for a response, but they had failed to reply. As a result, we were unable to proceed with the investigation and the complaint was classified as 'unresolved'.
Automatic translation: