The player from the United Kingdom who had a gambling addiction had requested an account closure and deposit prevention, but the casino had not acted on the request, leading to the player losing a significant amount of money. The player had demanded a refund and alleged that the casino was non-responsive to emails. The player had provided a list of transactions made after his request, totalling £7636.90. He had also claimed to have lost an additional £650 in winnings, but was not as concerned about this amount. Despite having provided email proof of his self-exclusion request, the casino had denied receiving such an email. The player had then provided a video as evidence, but the quality had been low and it had not been possible to definitively determine if the email was sent. We had concluded that self-exclusion only applied once confirmed by the casino team, and since the player had not received any confirmation, he was not eligible for a refund. The player had been advised to file an official complaint with the casino's licensing authority.