Dear Józef,
Could it be that you haven't fully devoted yourself to the issue? The responses are coming quite late. If you had watched the video and read through the documents I sent you via email, you would see that one must specify their birthdate at the time of registration. It's not possible to alter the birthdate afterwards. I have definitely entered my correct birthdate every time. Honestly, your statement that one can enter their birthdate post-registration surprises me, as that is incorrect—it can only be done during registration. Furthermore, at all other casinos and partner casinos, it is not possible to register with a different email and a different phone number but otherwise exactly the same data, because the system immediately recognizes that one has excluded themselves. All my details were correct, except for my phone number and my email address. I have never entered a different birthdate. And I have not engaged in any manipulations. Moreover, the video is meant to show that it's not about using special tricks and manipulations to register. The casino claims that I would have to use special tricks.
There is no player protection if registration with a different phone number and email is possible. These two pieces of information can change at any time. I was then able to deposit and play very, very often. Until I excluded myself again the second time with the note that I have a gambling addiction and had already excluded myself.
Online Casinos are required by law to protect players who have self-excluded due to gambling addiction, ensuring these players cannot re-register using altered personal information. Allowing a self-excluded player to gamble again can be seen as a failure to protect players, suggesting flaws in the casino's identification systems or inadequate enforcement of self-exclusion.
If a casino allows a self-excluded player to re-register and gamble, this could be seen as a failure on the part of the casino to fulfill its obligations to protect players. It could indicate weaknesses in their player identification systems or a lack of sufficient measures to ensure compliance with self-exclusion requests.
The specific legal consequences or the casino's liability may vary, but as a player who has suffered harm despite self-exclusion due to gambling addiction, I have the right to file complaints with regulatory authorities and initiate legal action against the casino. This is particularly applicable if the casino's failure has led to my financial or emotional harm.
In my case, it's clear and unequivocal that the casino failed by allowing someone with a gambling addiction like myself to gamble again. This happened with correct and relevant data, so there really is no basis for discussion. Had I provided a false name or birth date, one might argue. But even then, it would be the casino's duty to prove such discrepancies. I definitely provided all my information correctly. If Cashwin now claims this was not the case, even though this was never communicated before, they are obliged to prove it. Furthermore, they need to demonstrate that my birth date was not retroactively changed by them to decide the matter in their favor and against me. Should Cashwin come up with such a claim, I would suspect that they have altered the details after the fact. The casino's claim that it's difficult to re-register and that one needs special tricks was disproven by my experience. This statement was refuted by me. It would have been better if special tricks were indeed required for re-registration, as then I would never have been able to sign up again and incur further losses.
Best regards,
Erdalhan
Dear Józef,
Could it be that you haven't fully devoted yourself to the issue? The responses are coming quite late. If you had watched the video and read through the documents I sent you via email, you would see that one must specify their birthdate at the time of registration. It's not possible to alter the birthdate afterwards. I have definitely entered my correct birthdate every time. Honestly, your statement that one can enter their birthdate post-registration surprises me, as that is incorrect—it can only be done during registration. Furthermore, at all other casinos and partner casinos, it is not possible to register with a different email and a different phone number but otherwise exactly the same data, because the system immediately recognizes that one has excluded themselves. All my details were correct, except for my phone number and my email address. I have never entered a different birthdate. And I have not engaged in any manipulations. Moreover, the video is meant to show that it's not about using special tricks and manipulations to register. The casino claims that I would have to use special tricks.
There is no player protection if registration with a different phone number and email is possible. These two pieces of information can change at any time. I was then able to deposit and play very, very often. Until I excluded myself again the second time with the note that I have a gambling addiction and had already excluded myself.
Online Casinos are required by law to protect players who have self-excluded due to gambling addiction, ensuring these players cannot re-register using altered personal information. Allowing a self-excluded player to gamble again can be seen as a failure to protect players, suggesting flaws in the casino's identification systems or inadequate enforcement of self-exclusion.
If a casino allows a self-excluded player to re-register and gamble, this could be seen as a failure on the part of the casino to fulfill its obligations to protect players. It could indicate weaknesses in their player identification systems or a lack of sufficient measures to ensure compliance with self-exclusion requests.
The specific legal consequences or the casino's liability may vary, but as a player who has suffered harm despite self-exclusion due to gambling addiction, I have the right to file complaints with regulatory authorities and initiate legal action against the casino. This is particularly applicable if the casino's failure has led to my financial or emotional harm.
In my case, it's clear and unequivocal that the casino failed by allowing someone with a gambling addiction like myself to gamble again. This happened with correct and relevant data, so there really is no basis for discussion. Had I provided a false name or birth date, one might argue. But even then, it would be the casino's duty to prove such discrepancies. I definitely provided all my information correctly. If Cashwin now claims this was not the case, even though this was never communicated before, they are obliged to prove it. Furthermore, they need to demonstrate that my birth date was not retroactively changed by them to decide the matter in their favor and against me. Should Cashwin come up with such a claim, I would suspect that they have altered the details after the fact. The casino's claim that it's difficult to re-register and that one needs special tricks was disproven by my experience. This statement was refuted by me. It would have been better if special tricks were indeed required for re-registration, as then I would never have been able to sign up again and incur further losses.
Best regards,
Erdalhan