Thank you for your response and for the opportunity to clarify the situation further.
Addressing the Casino's Explanation:
Verification and Recognition of Country: The casino system reportedly recognized that I was from Thailand upon verification on 02-07-2024. However, this raises the question: why did the casino allow me to deposit, activate bonuses, and continue playing if my country of residence made me ineligible for these bonuses?
If the system could detect my location after verification, it is logical to assume that this recognition should have occurred immediately upon registration. There should have been an immediate block on my ability to claim bonuses if such bonuses were indeed restricted for players from Thailand.
No Activity Post-Verification: The claim that no activity occurred on the account after the verification process is inaccurate, as I had withdrawn funds multiple times, indicating that the account was still active and operational. Moreover, the verification process was initiated by the casino after I had already engaged with the bonuses and played games. This further highlights a discrepancy in the casino's enforcement of its own rules.
Entrapment and Fairness:
Allowing me to claim and use a bonus that the casino later deemed invalid due to my country of residence—without any warning or restriction at the point of registration or deposit—constitutes entrapment. This practice is highly unfair and goes against the principles of transparency and good faith in the gaming industry.
The casino's failure to enforce these restrictions in a timely manner does not justify the subsequent confiscation of my winnings. By allowing the bonus to be claimed and used, the casino effectively waived its right to later claim that I was ineligible for it.
Obligations and Justifications:
The casino is within its rights to restrict bonuses based on a player's country of residence. However, it is also obliged to ensure that these restrictions are clearly communicated and enforced from the outset. The fact that I was able to play and win before any issues were raised indicates that the system's checks were insufficient and that the responsibility lies with the casino to uphold its own terms.
Given the evidence presented, it is clear that Velobet Casino allowed me to engage with the bonus and only revoked my winnings post-factum, which is neither fair nor justified.
Request for Payment:
Based on the sequence of events and the shortcomings in the casino's enforcement of its own terms, I respectfully request that Velobet Casino honors the legitimate winnings accrued before any issue was raised. I have met all bonus requirements and adhered to the rules as they were presented to me at the time.
I look forward to a prompt and fair resolution to this matter.
Thank you for your response and for the opportunity to clarify the situation further.
Addressing the Casino's Explanation:
Verification and Recognition of Country: The casino system reportedly recognized that I was from Thailand upon verification on 02-07-2024. However, this raises the question: why did the casino allow me to deposit, activate bonuses, and continue playing if my country of residence made me ineligible for these bonuses?
If the system could detect my location after verification, it is logical to assume that this recognition should have occurred immediately upon registration. There should have been an immediate block on my ability to claim bonuses if such bonuses were indeed restricted for players from Thailand.
No Activity Post-Verification: The claim that no activity occurred on the account after the verification process is inaccurate, as I had withdrawn funds multiple times, indicating that the account was still active and operational. Moreover, the verification process was initiated by the casino after I had already engaged with the bonuses and played games. This further highlights a discrepancy in the casino's enforcement of its own rules.
Entrapment and Fairness:
Allowing me to claim and use a bonus that the casino later deemed invalid due to my country of residence—without any warning or restriction at the point of registration or deposit—constitutes entrapment. This practice is highly unfair and goes against the principles of transparency and good faith in the gaming industry.
The casino's failure to enforce these restrictions in a timely manner does not justify the subsequent confiscation of my winnings. By allowing the bonus to be claimed and used, the casino effectively waived its right to later claim that I was ineligible for it.
Obligations and Justifications:
The casino is within its rights to restrict bonuses based on a player's country of residence. However, it is also obliged to ensure that these restrictions are clearly communicated and enforced from the outset. The fact that I was able to play and win before any issues were raised indicates that the system's checks were insufficient and that the responsibility lies with the casino to uphold its own terms.
Given the evidence presented, it is clear that Velobet Casino allowed me to engage with the bonus and only revoked my winnings post-factum, which is neither fair nor justified.
Request for Payment:
Based on the sequence of events and the shortcomings in the casino's enforcement of its own terms, I respectfully request that Velobet Casino honors the legitimate winnings accrued before any issue was raised. I have met all bonus requirements and adhered to the rules as they were presented to me at the time.
I look forward to a prompt and fair resolution to this matter.