Hi Deanh7635,
I reviewed the forwarded communication:
Hi Dean,
Thanks for bringing this to our attention. We've raised this with the relevant team to update. This is not from our terms and conditions and is not a breach, it is a summary of the tool's mechanics. A 7-day cool-off does not apply to all Time Out periods, for example, if you were to take a 24-hour or 7 day time out, and request to remove it and it was approved, then entering into a cool-off period of 7 days would extend the end time of the time out, not shorten it.
However, we are satisfied that this content did not influence or impact you at the time and from the chat details you can see this. "I was only Ment to set for 24h for my withdrawal and to go trough" & "Is that not the day it was Ment to be removed anyway". So you are aware that the time out time is to be shortened and did not expect to enter an extended cool-off period of 7 days. You have reviewed this content on the tools after the fact. We have already advised that no refund will be offered; the point remains that you never raised any responsible gambling concerns with us so there is no obligation for us to refund these transactions as you were granted access again in line with your request and the company policies. You were given the opportunity to raise any concerns with us when asked for a reason and also had ample time to reverse your decision to remove the Time Out.
If you wish to raise this with Ask Gamblers or Casino Guru, this is your prerogative and we would be happy to assist them with their investigation.
Regards, Jamie, Slotbox Team
I believe this correspondence, along with previously mentioned details, elucidates the entire situation comprehensively. As per your prior comments, you raised this complaint to highlight the casino's treatment of users with gambling issues, suggesting it should have been discerned from your behavior. However, it's noted that you never explicitly informed the casino about your gambling problem. Subsequently, when the casino opted to block your account upon identifying potential signs of gambling addiction from your actions, you contested their decision. Regrettably, it's not feasible to have it both ways.
If you had clearly communicated your gambling problem to the casino, and if your request for permanent account closure was disregarded, we would be in a position to assist you.
Regarding the casino's identification of potential gambling issues from your behavior at a later stage, it's difficult to assert whether they should have done so earlier.
For future reference, I strongly recommend utilizing the provided template for self-exclusion and not relying solely on the casino to detect potential gambling problems based solely on your actions.
I wish I could be of more help. I’m sorry we couldn’t help you to resolve this case, but please do not hesitate to contact us if you run into any issues with any other casino in the future. For the abovementioned reasons, I will now reject this complaint. Thank you for your understanding.
Hi Deanh7635,
I reviewed the forwarded communication:
Hi Dean,
Thanks for bringing this to our attention. We've raised this with the relevant team to update. This is not from our terms and conditions and is not a breach, it is a summary of the tool's mechanics. A 7-day cool-off does not apply to all Time Out periods, for example, if you were to take a 24-hour or 7 day time out, and request to remove it and it was approved, then entering into a cool-off period of 7 days would extend the end time of the time out, not shorten it.
However, we are satisfied that this content did not influence or impact you at the time and from the chat details you can see this. "I was only Ment to set for 24h for my withdrawal and to go trough" & "Is that not the day it was Ment to be removed anyway". So you are aware that the time out time is to be shortened and did not expect to enter an extended cool-off period of 7 days. You have reviewed this content on the tools after the fact. We have already advised that no refund will be offered; the point remains that you never raised any responsible gambling concerns with us so there is no obligation for us to refund these transactions as you were granted access again in line with your request and the company policies. You were given the opportunity to raise any concerns with us when asked for a reason and also had ample time to reverse your decision to remove the Time Out.
If you wish to raise this with Ask Gamblers or Casino Guru, this is your prerogative and we would be happy to assist them with their investigation.
Regards, Jamie, Slotbox Team
I believe this correspondence, along with previously mentioned details, elucidates the entire situation comprehensively. As per your prior comments, you raised this complaint to highlight the casino's treatment of users with gambling issues, suggesting it should have been discerned from your behavior. However, it's noted that you never explicitly informed the casino about your gambling problem. Subsequently, when the casino opted to block your account upon identifying potential signs of gambling addiction from your actions, you contested their decision. Regrettably, it's not feasible to have it both ways.
If you had clearly communicated your gambling problem to the casino, and if your request for permanent account closure was disregarded, we would be in a position to assist you.
Regarding the casino's identification of potential gambling issues from your behavior at a later stage, it's difficult to assert whether they should have done so earlier.
For future reference, I strongly recommend utilizing the provided template for self-exclusion and not relying solely on the casino to detect potential gambling problems based solely on your actions.
I wish I could be of more help. I’m sorry we couldn’t help you to resolve this case, but please do not hesitate to contact us if you run into any issues with any other casino in the future. For the abovementioned reasons, I will now reject this complaint. Thank you for your understanding.