Dear Rooli Casino team,
Thank you for the clarification and your email.
However, if something is in the casino's Terms and Conditions, it does not automatically mean it is correct or fair.
"That being said, the maximum win persists after the wagering requirement is met.
We do not force users to withdraw at time of completion of bonus wagering so we check source of winnings when a user requests a cashout.
In this case, the winnings were made solely from the no deposit bonus and this is the reason the winnings were then cut to the maximum once again."
What is the reason for bonus terms being applied after the wagering requirements were met and the bonus successfully converted to a withdrawable balance since from this moment it is considered real money?
How does the casino imagine a player's further play with a real money balance obtained in such a way than to withdraw the maximum cashout and deposit it back into the account (but the casino does not force players to do it...)? Why are players allowed to continue playing after meeting the wagering requirements (with a withdrawable balance that we can consider real money, cleared from everything over the maximum cashout) if they are basically not able to win more but they can lose?
What is the difference between continuing to play right after meeting bonus wagering requirements and meeting all bonus conditions AND withdrawing the maximum cashout and subsequent deposit of it back to the casino?
Is there any additional notification about this fact/rule and its application after meeting WRs? If so, can you clarify it and provide us with a screenshot?
Unfortunately, we cannot agree with applying the maximum cashout more than once, especially if all the bonus terms and conditions completely were met, the balance was converted to a withdrawable balance (real money), there is no reason for bonus rules application anymore, and users are not notified about it sufficiently upon meeting the wagering requirements.
If I overlooked something important, feel free to correct me. Otherwise, we would like to recommend the casino restore the user's winnings that were confiscated a second time.
Dear Rooli Casino team,
Thank you for the clarification and your email.
However, if something is in the casino's Terms and Conditions, it does not automatically mean it is correct or fair.
"That being said, the maximum win persists after the wagering requirement is met.
We do not force users to withdraw at time of completion of bonus wagering so we check source of winnings when a user requests a cashout.
In this case, the winnings were made solely from the no deposit bonus and this is the reason the winnings were then cut to the maximum once again."
What is the reason for bonus terms being applied after the wagering requirements were met and the bonus successfully converted to a withdrawable balance since from this moment it is considered real money?
How does the casino imagine a player's further play with a real money balance obtained in such a way than to withdraw the maximum cashout and deposit it back into the account (but the casino does not force players to do it...)? Why are players allowed to continue playing after meeting the wagering requirements (with a withdrawable balance that we can consider real money, cleared from everything over the maximum cashout) if they are basically not able to win more but they can lose?
What is the difference between continuing to play right after meeting bonus wagering requirements and meeting all bonus conditions AND withdrawing the maximum cashout and subsequent deposit of it back to the casino?
Is there any additional notification about this fact/rule and its application after meeting WRs? If so, can you clarify it and provide us with a screenshot?
Unfortunately, we cannot agree with applying the maximum cashout more than once, especially if all the bonus terms and conditions completely were met, the balance was converted to a withdrawable balance (real money), there is no reason for bonus rules application anymore, and users are not notified about it sufficiently upon meeting the wagering requirements.
If I overlooked something important, feel free to correct me. Otherwise, we would like to recommend the casino restore the user's winnings that were confiscated a second time.
Edited by a Casino Guru admin