The player from Brazil had attempted to withdraw funds from his account, but was asked for documents. Two days later, his account had been deactivated. After the player had provided the necessary information, we had contacted the casino regarding the withdrawal issue. The casino had stated that the player had been involved in opposite betting strategies with another player from the same IP address, which was deemed as collusion. The casino had provided evidence to support their claim. We had asked the player to comment on this, but received no response. Consequently, we had supported the casino's decision and the complaint was rejected.