I have played at this casino before both with and without bonuses. I have been fully verified and previous withdrawals have been paid out.
The casino has a weekly live casino bonus which I availed of last week. I finished the bonus and accrued a total of €6000. I then went to withdraw €2000 and received later a surprising message:
MESSAGE BEGINS==========================================
We are writing to inform you of an important update regarding your account balance. Following a recent review of your activity related to your pending withdrawal, we have identified a breach and abuse of the bonus terms and conditions. Specifically, you have wagered above the maximum bet amount on multiple occasions while doubling up on bets in Blackjack. This activity increased your total wager per round to 100 EUR, exceeding the allowed limit.
As a result, your account balance has been fortified in accordance with our policies. We strongly encourage you to review our Bonus Terms and Conditions to ensure full compliance in the future.
MESSAGE ENDS============================================
^^^ This relates to term 13 of the bonus which simply states "max bet €50 [and currency equivalents]". (Screenshots available on request.)
Firstly, this rule does not stipulate whether the max bet applies solely to the bet ante or includes doubling up on games such as Blackjack.
Secondly, clearly there is no soft-lock to prevent exceeding the max bet in whatever form it takes.
Thirdly, I seem to recall before starting the bonus that the terms included the line something like "Bets above the maximum are allowed but will not contribute to the bonus wagering." Therefore, it is possible the term changed "after the event" so to speak. However, in fairness, I can only give a 50% probability in terms of my confidence for this.
However, even excluding my third argument above, surely I have a reasonable case to make with the first and second arguments.
After all, my balance has been set to zero, which I think is unfair and I hope Casino Guru can make a case for me here.
I have played at this casino before both with and without bonuses. I have been fully verified and previous withdrawals have been paid out.
The casino has a weekly live casino bonus which I availed of last week. I finished the bonus and accrued a total of €6000. I then went to withdraw €2000 and received later a surprising message:
MESSAGE BEGINS==========================================
We are writing to inform you of an important update regarding your account balance. Following a recent review of your activity related to your pending withdrawal, we have identified a breach and abuse of the bonus terms and conditions. Specifically, you have wagered above the maximum bet amount on multiple occasions while doubling up on bets in Blackjack. This activity increased your total wager per round to 100 EUR, exceeding the allowed limit.
As a result, your account balance has been fortified in accordance with our policies. We strongly encourage you to review our Bonus Terms and Conditions to ensure full compliance in the future.
MESSAGE ENDS============================================
^^^ This relates to term 13 of the bonus which simply states "max bet €50 [and currency equivalents]". (Screenshots available on request.)
Firstly, this rule does not stipulate whether the max bet applies solely to the bet ante or includes doubling up on games such as Blackjack.
Secondly, clearly there is no soft-lock to prevent exceeding the max bet in whatever form it takes.
Thirdly, I seem to recall before starting the bonus that the terms included the line something like "Bets above the maximum are allowed but will not contribute to the bonus wagering." Therefore, it is possible the term changed "after the event" so to speak. However, in fairness, I can only give a 50% probability in terms of my confidence for this.
However, even excluding my third argument above, surely I have a reasonable case to make with the first and second arguments.
After all, my balance has been set to zero, which I think is unfair and I hope Casino Guru can make a case for me here.