Dear papicsolana,
The casino team has responded to my email and confirmed that I am allowed to share their reply here.
Thank you for reaching out. I am writing in response to the complaint received about Solcasino from "Papicsolana". The timeline of events provided is missing critical information. "Papicsolana" has largely misrepresented Solcasino actions, the NFT collection, our value return mechanics, and general information about our business. I will address each of these points sequentially.
We minted our Non-Fungible Token (NFT) collection in late March for 12 Solana. We provided our holders the option to "Lock" their NFTs on our platform for anywhere between 15-90 days. In exchange for this "lock", the user was returned the entire 12 Solana mint price. "Papicsolana" "Locked" his NFT during this time, and was given 12 Solana per NFT locked. All of "Papicsolana" NFTs were acquired at no-cost to him. This material fact was misrepresented in the initial complaint when "Papicsolana" stated these NFTs were "not gifted in any sense".
We have an industry standard self-exclusion policy on our platform. We take self-exclusion very seriously, as all casinos should. In order to self-exclude, the user must click through various pages and warnings and manually select the time period for exclusion. This excludes the user from accessing any domain related to Solcasino, including the sub-domain we use for our "lock" mechanic. After self-excluding, the user will not be able to access their account nor tokens within that account, including Non-Fungible Tokens. Please see the attached screenshot of our Self-Exclusion policy page and its information.
"Papicsolana" proceeded to click through the various warnings and manually select his exclusion term on his own volition. He selected the term "forever" himself, knowing this would in-fact exclude him from the casino "forever". This material fact was misrepresented in the initial complaint when "Papicsolana" stated his exclusion period had "long-since been released". If this were the case, he would be able to access the casino.
As you can see from "Papicsolana" initial complaint, we communicated to him multiple times that we would look into a resolution. After many months of our development team working to find a remedy, we were unable to do so. This material fact was misrepresented in the initial complaint where "Papicsolana" stated he "never heard from us". Please see the attached logs of our communications with "Papicsolana".
Further, our Terms and Conditions clearly state that in the event a user "forever" excludes himself from the Casino, there is no way to access his account, including tokens within said token account, both Fungible and Non-Fungible. These Terms and Conditions are featured prominently on our websites landing page. You can find our Self-Exclusion Terms and Conditions here: https://docs.solcasino.io/info/self-exclusion-terms-and-condition.
We understand and sympathize with "Papicsolana", and have spoken with this user throughout the course of this search of a remedy. We are saddened to learn about this complaint and this seemingly malicious misrepresentation of our actions throughout this process. Thank you for taking the time, and we hope this will be swiftly resolved.
Dear papicsolana,
The casino team has responded to my email and confirmed that I am allowed to share their reply here.
Thank you for reaching out. I am writing in response to the complaint received about Solcasino from "Papicsolana". The timeline of events provided is missing critical information. "Papicsolana" has largely misrepresented Solcasino actions, the NFT collection, our value return mechanics, and general information about our business. I will address each of these points sequentially.
We minted our Non-Fungible Token (NFT) collection in late March for 12 Solana. We provided our holders the option to "Lock" their NFTs on our platform for anywhere between 15-90 days. In exchange for this "lock", the user was returned the entire 12 Solana mint price. "Papicsolana" "Locked" his NFT during this time, and was given 12 Solana per NFT locked. All of "Papicsolana" NFTs were acquired at no-cost to him. This material fact was misrepresented in the initial complaint when "Papicsolana" stated these NFTs were "not gifted in any sense".
We have an industry standard self-exclusion policy on our platform. We take self-exclusion very seriously, as all casinos should. In order to self-exclude, the user must click through various pages and warnings and manually select the time period for exclusion. This excludes the user from accessing any domain related to Solcasino, including the sub-domain we use for our "lock" mechanic. After self-excluding, the user will not be able to access their account nor tokens within that account, including Non-Fungible Tokens. Please see the attached screenshot of our Self-Exclusion policy page and its information.
"Papicsolana" proceeded to click through the various warnings and manually select his exclusion term on his own volition. He selected the term "forever" himself, knowing this would in-fact exclude him from the casino "forever". This material fact was misrepresented in the initial complaint when "Papicsolana" stated his exclusion period had "long-since been released". If this were the case, he would be able to access the casino.
As you can see from "Papicsolana" initial complaint, we communicated to him multiple times that we would look into a resolution. After many months of our development team working to find a remedy, we were unable to do so. This material fact was misrepresented in the initial complaint where "Papicsolana" stated he "never heard from us". Please see the attached logs of our communications with "Papicsolana".
Further, our Terms and Conditions clearly state that in the event a user "forever" excludes himself from the Casino, there is no way to access his account, including tokens within said token account, both Fungible and Non-Fungible. These Terms and Conditions are featured prominently on our websites landing page. You can find our Self-Exclusion Terms and Conditions here: https://docs.solcasino.io/info/self-exclusion-terms-and-condition.
We understand and sympathize with "Papicsolana", and have spoken with this user throughout the course of this search of a remedy. We are saddened to learn about this complaint and this seemingly malicious misrepresentation of our actions throughout this process. Thank you for taking the time, and we hope this will be swiftly resolved.
Edited by a Casino Guru admin