Hello ekinciren99,
I'm Michal, and I have taken over your complaint. I have reviewed this case and I will contact the casino to shed more light on this matter.
We would like to invite Slots&Bets Casino to join the conversation.
Dear Slots&Bets Casino,
Can you please provide more information if the wagering with minimum risk "tactic" is the only reason that led you to confiscate the player's winnings? I have checked your bonus terms and conditions and while I understand your perspective that the player's gameplay might align with your definition of bonus abuse as mentioned here:
2.1.8 Players using the minimum risk wagering tactic will have their bonuses canceled immediately and no longer available.
however, we need to question the assumption that switching from high-risk to low-risk betting after a significant win gives the player an unfair advantage. This behavior is quite reasonable among the vast majority of players, as they tend to become more cautious after winning, fearing potential losses.
It's important to remember that all casino games have a house edge, ensuring the casino's profitability even with low-risk bets. Therefore, there is no valid reason to penalize such gameplay. As we mentioned in Our Position on Banning Betting Patterns and Strategies. I kindly ask you to reconsider your decision, or if there are other reasons that have an impact on your decision, please share them with us. If the information, including supporting evidence, can't be shared publicly, please forward it to me at michal.k@casino.guru
Hello ekinciren99,
I'm Michal, and I have taken over your complaint. I have reviewed this case and I will contact the casino to shed more light on this matter.
We would like to invite Slots&Bets Casino to join the conversation.
Dear Slots&Bets Casino,
Can you please provide more information if the wagering with minimum risk "tactic" is the only reason that led you to confiscate the player's winnings? I have checked your bonus terms and conditions and while I understand your perspective that the player's gameplay might align with your definition of bonus abuse as mentioned here:
2.1.8 Players using the minimum risk wagering tactic will have their bonuses canceled immediately and no longer available.
however, we need to question the assumption that switching from high-risk to low-risk betting after a significant win gives the player an unfair advantage. This behavior is quite reasonable among the vast majority of players, as they tend to become more cautious after winning, fearing potential losses.
It's important to remember that all casino games have a house edge, ensuring the casino's profitability even with low-risk bets. Therefore, there is no valid reason to penalize such gameplay. As we mentioned in Our Position on Banning Betting Patterns and Strategies. I kindly ask you to reconsider your decision, or if there are other reasons that have an impact on your decision, please share them with us. If the information, including supporting evidence, can't be shared publicly, please forward it to me at michal.k@casino.guru
Edited by a Casino Guru admin