The player from Mexico had winnings of more than ten thousand pesos confiscated. The casino claimed the funds were won using bonuses, and that he registered multiple accounts, accusations he denied. The player had evidence to back up his claims. He explained that he and his colleagues, who also registered and played at the casino, used the same Wi-Fi network at their workplace. The player insisted that they all used their individual devices and payment methods. Despite the player's willingness to provide identification for all involved, the casino had not resolved the issue. Due to lack of response from the player to the Complaints Team's further inquiries, we had to reject the complaint. However, the player could reopen the case in the future if he decided to resume communication.
The player from Mexico had winnings of more than ten thousand pesos confiscated. The casino claimed the funds were won using bonuses, and that he registered multiple accounts, accusations he denied. The player had evidence to back up his claims. He explained that he and his colleagues, who also registered and played at the casino, used the same Wi-Fi network at their workplace. The player insisted that they all used their individual devices and payment methods. Despite the player's willingness to provide identification for all involved, the casino had not resolved the issue. Due to lack of response from the player to the Complaints Team's further inquiries, we had to reject the complaint. However, the player could reopen the case in the future if he decided to resume communication.
Automatic translation: