Thanks for the provided proof to the Loco Joker Casino team.
Dear Zmistman,
While it is normal for a casino to have a rule stating one account per household/IP address/player, we feel each case should be considered separately. If the player has multiple accounts and has used them to repeatedly gain bonuses they should only receive once, this is obviously a clear breach of the terms and an unfair advantage.
However, if there is no clear advantage gained by the player and it is conceivable that an honest mistake has been made (for example, the player forgot they registered a long time ago and registered again), we do not think a player should have their winnings confiscated.
The casino has provided evidence that indicates multiple accounts linked to your account by a number of different factors (mentioned in my previous post), while the signup bonus was claimed and played.
Unless there are circumstances I overlooked, I believe the casino's actions were justified in this case.
Thanks for the provided proof to the Loco Joker Casino team.
Dear Zmistman,
While it is normal for a casino to have a rule stating one account per household/IP address/player, we feel each case should be considered separately. If the player has multiple accounts and has used them to repeatedly gain bonuses they should only receive once, this is obviously a clear breach of the terms and an unfair advantage.
However, if there is no clear advantage gained by the player and it is conceivable that an honest mistake has been made (for example, the player forgot they registered a long time ago and registered again), we do not think a player should have their winnings confiscated.
The casino has provided evidence that indicates multiple accounts linked to your account by a number of different factors (mentioned in my previous post), while the signup bonus was claimed and played.
Unless there are circumstances I overlooked, I believe the casino's actions were justified in this case.