Dear Casino Guru Support,
Thank you for reviewing my complaint against Boom Line B.V. (Gangsta Casino). However, I would like to challenge your stance that their license transition is not an issue and provide further clarification on key regulatory concerns that impact this case.
1. Transactions Processed with Incorrect MCC Codes
The core issue of my complaint is that Boom Line B.V. deliberately misused MCC (Merchant Category Codes) to bypass banking restrictions on gambling transactions.
This is a direct violation of financial regulations and responsible gambling policies, regardless of whether their Curaçao license was in transition.
Such practices are deceptive and raise serious compliance concerns under payment processing rules.
2. Licensing Irregularities
Boom Line B.V. operated under Antillephone sub-license 8048/JAZ2022-019, which, following the introduction of Curaçao’s new regulatory framework in December 2024, became invalid unless transitioned into a direct license.
They only submitted their license application on January 31, 2025, meaning they were likely operating without a valid Curaçao license for at least a month.
This raises questions about whether they had the legal standing to process transactions during that period.
3. Failure to Respond to Complaints
The casino has ignored multiple attempts to resolve this matter directly.
Curaçao’s new licensing rules emphasize increased player protection and accountability, yet Boom Line B.V. has failed to engage in any resolution process.
A refusal to acknowledge complaints raises further doubts about their commitment to compliance and fair business practices.
4. Action Taken
I have already contacted the Curaçao Gaming Control Board (GCB) regarding this issue and provided them with all relevant correspondence.
Additionally, I have shared all communications with my bank to initiate a chargeback due to the fraudulent practices employed by Gangsta Casino.
Request for Further Review
Given the above concerns, I request that Casino Guru reassess the complaint with these factors in mind. The misuse of MCC codes alone is a severe issue, and when combined with the lack of regulatory compliance and failure to respond to disputes, it creates a strong case for intervention.
I appreciate your time in reviewing this further and look forward to your response.
Best regards,
Dear Casino Guru Support,
Thank you for reviewing my complaint against Boom Line B.V. (Gangsta Casino). However, I would like to challenge your stance that their license transition is not an issue and provide further clarification on key regulatory concerns that impact this case.
1. Transactions Processed with Incorrect MCC Codes
The core issue of my complaint is that Boom Line B.V. deliberately misused MCC (Merchant Category Codes) to bypass banking restrictions on gambling transactions.
This is a direct violation of financial regulations and responsible gambling policies, regardless of whether their Curaçao license was in transition.
Such practices are deceptive and raise serious compliance concerns under payment processing rules.
2. Licensing Irregularities
Boom Line B.V. operated under Antillephone sub-license 8048/JAZ2022-019, which, following the introduction of Curaçao’s new regulatory framework in December 2024, became invalid unless transitioned into a direct license.
They only submitted their license application on January 31, 2025, meaning they were likely operating without a valid Curaçao license for at least a month.
This raises questions about whether they had the legal standing to process transactions during that period.
3. Failure to Respond to Complaints
The casino has ignored multiple attempts to resolve this matter directly.
Curaçao’s new licensing rules emphasize increased player protection and accountability, yet Boom Line B.V. has failed to engage in any resolution process.
A refusal to acknowledge complaints raises further doubts about their commitment to compliance and fair business practices.
4. Action Taken
I have already contacted the Curaçao Gaming Control Board (GCB) regarding this issue and provided them with all relevant correspondence.
Additionally, I have shared all communications with my bank to initiate a chargeback due to the fraudulent practices employed by Gangsta Casino.
Request for Further Review
Given the above concerns, I request that Casino Guru reassess the complaint with these factors in mind. The misuse of MCC codes alone is a severe issue, and when combined with the lack of regulatory compliance and failure to respond to disputes, it creates a strong case for intervention.
I appreciate your time in reviewing this further and look forward to your response.
Best regards,