Balvinder sambhi breaking the roulette wheel book (page 3)

You repeatedly promote the book, completely ignoring the facts presented to you. Now you've come up with a win of $1 for each spin with a bankroll of $350. Do you not remember the illustrations you posted in previous messages? Allow me to remind you. Here they are:

As you can see, I highlighted in red the profit from winnings for the initial bets in your progression. They range from 30 pence (bets in your scheme in British pounds) to 80 pence. At today's exchange rates, this amounts to 37 cents to 1 US dollar. And not always 1 US dollar, you know.

I've already demonstrated above that with the approach to bets you've indicated, you will inevitably lose. According to your own scheme, your loss would be £222 or £863 (I circled the total bankroll in blue). Returning this loss with winnings of 30-80 pence will likely take you several months, assuming fate is favorable to you, and you don't lose another £222 or £863.

What $350 bankroll are you mentioning when none of the options you provided contains such amounts, even when converting pounds to dollars? You're inventing something new as the discussion progresses. Ok, even if you have $350, you'll just loose it.

Your advertising is aimed at novice players who know little about roulette, and I presume they would willingly believe the fictions you're telling.

That's good you spotted this. You're right about the book, but as far as it's in the right thread (about roulette) and no links included...Yeah, we're quite hesitant when if comes to deleting user's posts.

So, according to your explanation, if I, say, mention anything on YouTube without posting a link to it, it will be OK? I mean, if I say something like: 'Hey, guys, just look for 'some product name' on YouTube or Google to learn more about some roulette strategy!' — that will do?

Well, my experience in discussions here tells me I'll have some problems with that. 🙂

OK, I'm just kidding. 🙂 Let her promote the book since other people can share their thoughts about it, to keep newbies safe.

Allo4ka I have posted 2 free winings systems at no cost. You have post 0 winnings systems.

Please post a no lose winning system and we can all check and see. I will be waiting for you post. Lets see.

Firstly, what two systems are you talking about? You wrote about one system concerning bets on 2 corners. The fact that different progressions and entry expectations are used there doesn't make this one game system two different ones.

Secondly, what you have posted is not a winning system. It doesn't work in the long run. I confirmed this with real examples on real roulette tables in various online casinos, showing that bets according to the system you specified would often exceed the limits set by your system.

Thirdly, as I mentioned before, your proposed strategy is not a system for continuous play in the long run, as you claim. It suggests waiting for a favorable situation, entering the game, winning, and waiting for the next entry into the game. This approach is not a strategy for the long run, as you assert.

Finally, I don't recall ever saying that I have any winning systems for you to demand that I publish them. I have various tactics that I mentioned in various topics on this forum, tactics that help win on one table for a short period. But any 'universal foolproof systems' — leave those tales for inexperienced users.

Here are a few tactics off the top of my head for short-term play:

• Wait for the non-appearance of any category of even chances for a long time (for example, 20-21 misses on red) and bet on this category using the Martingale progression until you win, then stop and wait again;
• Wait for the non-appearance of any dozen or column for a long time (for example, 25-28 misses in the first dozen) and bet on this category using the Fibonacci progression until you win, then stop and wait again;
• Wait for consecutive hits of any one dozen or column for a long time (for example, 10-12 hits in the first column) and then bet on the other two, increasing the bet by 4 four times after each loss until you win, then stop and wait again;
• Wait until the number of hits in any dozen or column in the last 50 spins is less than 8% (for example, 2 dozen hits in the last 50 spins occurred in only 6% of cases), then bet on that dozen using the Fibonacci progression until you win, then stop and wait again…

There are dozens of examples like these; I won't list them all. Each of them provides an opportunity to win in a very short distance in 1-5 spins. The situations I described occur on gaming tables all the time, allowing you to finish the game on one table and almost immediately go to another table and win there. If you are monitoring a sufficiently large number of tables simultaneously, as I do, for example.

Free no lose 1 repeat corner betting system

There are 23 corner sets below

0  1   2  3

1  2   4  5

2  3   5  6

4  5   7  8

5  6   8  9

7  8  10 11

8  9  11 12

10 11 13 16

11 12 14 15

13 14 16 17

14 15 17 18

16 17 19 20

17 18 20 21

19 20 22 23

20 21 23 24

22 23 25 26

23 24 26 27

25 26 28 29

26 27 29 30

28 29 31 32

29 30 32 33

31 32 34 35

32 33 35 36

Each corner has its own count. I will use 8 9 11 12 corner for this example but you need to track all corners at the same time to track all corners.

This is a cycle system. This means when a number appears example 8 9 11 12, does a 8 9 11 12 the next direct spin appear? No count 1 then we wait for another 8 9 11 12 to appear. Yes then we reset back to 0 count.

1. Track all 23 possible corner sets simultaneously.

2. Any corner set must appear 65 times BEFORE you even start to bet.

3. After the 65th appearance that set is qualified and then you start to bet. You bet for one spin only. Now:

a) you hit -> it's over. Look/wait for another corner set qualification and start a new game.

b) you missed -> you wait for that very corner to appear again and repeat your bet again, for one spin only.

4. You can have up to 25 such 'attack attempts', using the progression Kareva7 provided above. The goal is to catch an immediate repeat.

betting chart on 1 corner

 66  1  

 67  1  

 68  1  

 69  1  

 70  1  

 71  2  

 72  2  

 73  2  

 74  3  

 75  3  

 76  4  

 77  4  

 78  5  

 79  5  

 80  6  

 81  6  

 82  7  

 83  8  

 84  9  

 85  10  

 86  12  

 87  15  

 88  15  

 89  18  

 90  20  

Mr. KAREVA7....please

Me, Zoran and Mrs. Allo4ka are top roulette connoisseurs.

Don't invent hot water for us.

Tell that story to inexperienced new players.

Can you understand for once !!!

THERE IS NO SYSTEM THAT BRINGS SURE PROFIT.

what did you do at corner 8...9...11...12. ???

Well it's exactly the same angle as any roulette angle, 1,2,4,5...13,14,16,17...28,29,31,32. IT'S ALL THE SAME.

Can your brain figure that out?

Every professional, experienced roulette player doesn't want to talk about a system. Every experienced roulette player has his own individual tactics. And everything is based on the fact that a profit can be made in the short term. And which tactic will be applied depends on the current situation on the table where we are playing at that moment.

On-line roulette (auto roulette) works on the RNG system. ( RANDOM NUMBER GENERATOR) and such a system has certain periods when it throws mixed sectors...when it throws the same sectors...when a certain sector comes out below the percentage and many more options.

I know how to recognize those moments and build the current game on that observation. I stay as short as possible on that roulette. I make a profit and leave that roulette.

You are more boring with your system for total beginners. You came here to advertise a book that has 1 review, xaxaxa.

YOU ARE FUNNY 🙂

And I will no longer engage in dialogue with KAREVA7 because it is way below my level.

Jedna od mojih pobeda. I poruči tom Belvinderu da ima jedan bolji igrač od njega. A to sam Ja

Let me explain the previous game. As I guessed number 4 then 2.

I followed the roulette. In the last 100 throws, the sector from 32 to 36 worked very poorly. Number 2 and 4 not at all. When 19 came down I simply placed the main bet on 2 and 4. It could have come down on 21..or oper 19..or 15 but it's all a matter of probability.

I have said more than once: I DO NOT RECOGNIZE THE LUCK FACTOR. That's just a word (happiness).

And it fell 4, then 2. It happened. Ok..let's move on. Orfanell also fell poorly. I start based on the analysis of the previous rolls to favor the sector of zero spins and continue towards number 17. I left out the small series because it fell in the previous period and with these auto roulettes there is a rule that when a series has a lot of falls it must also stop.

You noticed. The best numbers that gave him a plus after 2 and 4 were the orphans....6...1...and finally 17 which brought the final plus. Also the repetition of the number 35 was logical because the sector zero deck did not repeat itself

(it didn't come out 2 X in a row a lot of throws.) And logically I boosted it. And it happened (that law of probability again) 😉

After the winning number 17 and a payout of around rsd 53,000 (€450) I replayed the game to honor the shot. That's how it's always done. To be honest, I was expecting a small series, but number 32 fell. It would have a small payout. My fault because there was a lapse in concentration. I should have played it better.

Final balance. Initial deposit RSDC 3,300 (€25)...

............................ output RSD 97,000 (€800)

And remember the GOLDEN RULE:

Do not let roulette keep you in the game for more than 30 minutes max.

Because then the concentration relaxes and the brain pulls you further into the game, there is a slight addiction and the desire to get more. And that's the mistake of 98% of players. THERE IS THE ADVANTAGE OF ROULETTE. And not in mathematics.

Mathematics is on the roulette side only on paper, IN PRACTICE IT IS NOT!

She is on the player's side for the short term.

So..don't stay long on roulette...!

Go out and come back after 2 hours when the brain is back to zero again.

I think it has already been explained how it works on this forum and Daniel also stated how it is. Hehe, but I noticed that you also wrote that you were joking, so I take it you already know the rules, because they were communicated with you. 🙂

Anyway, of course everyone can make a personal opinion who understands the roulette topic. 

JARO..why doesn't the video work. It works for me

For me it said it was private and the only place I could get to was the main youtube page.

Then there is something to adjust.. I'll take a look

Does the video work?

zorans71- YES I am funny and I win. You play but lose. this why you will not post a winning system for to see and check. I have posted two free systems. Players can check they win every time. This is winning not losing with your losing tactics.

Every gambler say I am winner, where is your proof? there is no proof, No confirmations your a a long term winner. No articles, No books, Just talk with losses. I have not been playing roulette for 30 years but all I see is losers everywhere.

The only way to confirm winning or losing is post your system with exact conditions. we all test, then see results. Balvinder winning, zorans71 losing confirmed.

Are you crazy?

Which winning system should we set up.

Well, there is NO winning system. That's why we don't post it.

F**k you BELVINDER. goodbye

You haven't provided a single piece of evidence that you win with any of your systems. Just words. I've shown you with real data from real casinos that it doesn't work. But you continue to prove something without any facts.

Your promotion won't work anymore: any user who starts reading this discussion will see that behind your words and your system, there is nothing but loss. It's unlikely that anyone will buy your book after this. Look for success somewhere else.

I've written to you about the conditions under which your system with 2 corners can work successfully, but it seems you don't care about that. You need to sell the book. 😂

Let him go. Don't argue. He writes this on purpose.

Fool. When we do not correspond with him, he will leave.

Works for me!