Advice for New Gamblers: What advice would you give to someone new to gambling? (page 4)

There are several messages here

about using demo mode

for training and practice.

I think for pure games

foresight (forecast)":

- roulette,

- baccarat.

- bac bo,

- sic bo,

it's better to train without doing

bets with the game buttons, but bet only

in your mind or on paper.

The case of a forecast regarding a closed card

Blackjack dealer allows

other approaches.

Is that how you do it in roulette? It's quite interesting, isn't it? Do you have any good success rate when you do it this way? 

It so happened that I tried

give in several messages

fairly general and universal recommendations.

They will suit the player,

armed by any means

choice of rates and for any game. Yes, personal experience confirms this . In the previous

the message only spoke about

training in any game by any

way. In that case it is better

use demo game only

as an independent RNG.

In some cases it is desirable

when training to make decisions about bets

with a frequency close to

real game cycles (spins, hands...)

And before that I mentioned the possibility of a fairly simple

and quick (especially for roulette) analysis of the game's effectiveness.

I hope I didn't disappoint

no one due to the lack of prepared and

full of "strategies" in these tips. ☺️

I feel a little foolish here. Because every time I give roulette a try, I feel like there are far to many possibilities and options going on. I am completely overwhelmed. Quite disappointed to see I'm still not the roulette person...

Do not feel foolish. Over time, roulette has been designed with many, many ways to bet. It basically allows players who like low, medium, and high risk to all play at the same time. Low risk players will stay on the outside bets (like red vs black) while high risk players will go after the inside numbers. And because roulette truly is gambling (wagering on a random event) every conceivable betting strategy (again from low to high risk) is available. If you try it again, I would recommend focusing on one type of bet where you can play with a style you like. It does not have to be complicated with chips all over the board. Even the simple act of just placing a single chip on green can be a strategy (with moderate volatility).

Yes, it is not uncommon to encounter

discussions about the "gambler's fallacy".

But, since ANY bet

has the same advantage for regular players

casino, lose more

"an infallible player" this

supposedly ignorant - can't.

On the other side,

every RIGHT effort can

increase reliability and

efficiency. Up to

the player receiving some

temporary advantage.

Even mysterious luck, good fortune

can be analyzed and "built up".

Finding a legitimate way to win is neither evil nor dangerous

for the gambling business.

Let's remember how interest grew

to blackjack after the publication of Basic Strategy and Counting Methods.

A similar picture was observed

and with a tape measure.

One successful player wrote:

"A perfect parasite does not kill its host."

But he also said: "I’m not ready to sell.

for money "a typing machine

money"

(that is, the method, "Gelddruckmaschine")

And how many people will stop drinking?

for the sake of winning and defeat dementia?

That's it, I guess. It offers every possibility all the time. 🙂

Thank you for your point of view.

I imagine this is the way of freedom many players love. I have to work on my way to decide what I will be happy with... Sadly, this is something I find challenging, especially when enjoying hobbies. So, one step at a time. Got it.

The situation is this:

- newbies exist,

- advice for them too,

- the advice should be useful.

First of all, attempts to play

on the net are like going on a hike

berries in the forest, where there are plenty of bears, including man-eaters. They say that many

some of them are quite friendly.

But the total risk makes the price

berries are prohibitively high.

The same is true in online casinos, where

they may not be able to withdraw money. Therefore, even honest

roulettes total "loss"

will be clearly higher than 2.7%.

In many areas of activity

Beginners may be initially equipped, prepared and even trained. Therefore, advice does not necessarily have to be

be primitive. For example,

Next I want to consider reasonable (even mathematically) cases of doubling the rate and give a simple

a method for assessing the effectiveness of a game and the randomness of its outcomes.

In fact, criticism that is mathematically based,

is usually subjected to deliberate action

simplified, "castrated"

Martingale. And twice:

1. The method is deprived of an important

advantages, selection rules

initial rate (and in others

"betting systems" and this does not exist),

2. This same rule increases

efficiency of the method.

In its simplest form, you need to

wait (for a long time) for several occurrences in a row (>6) of one of the equal chances.

In a more complex way - to monitor

several roulettes, it's faster.

But what is truly justified is the sharp

raising the stakes under threat

ruin.

With a large number of games and a low bet, the losing player will eventually lose to zero, and the player with a high bet has a greater chance of getting enough color to finish the game with a profit. For example, if you triple the bet, the probability of jumping out of the ruin corridor will increase 11 times! However, in the model without "0",

where the chances are 0.5.

And one more case - when the cycles

games, spins, follow more often than

the player is used to. That is, his forecast may be correct, but not for the nearest, but for the next spin. Then it makes sense to repeat the bet once, possibly even increased.

This applies to both Baccarat and

Sic bo.

Simple and quite accurate

way to determine:

1. The effectiveness of the game method,

(whether the case is defeated).

2. Does the wheel have a bias?

(flaws, bias).

3. Is the roulette missing?

bets?

We will talk about the dispersion of deviations from the mathematical

expectations. But not money, but spins.

For the above distribution, the variance is

(variance) will be equal to the product of three numbers:

- the number of spins n,

- the probability of one of the outcomes p,

- the probability of another outcome (spin result) q.

q=1-p

And variance Var(X) or D(X)=npq=np(1- p)

We will work with

‌the standard deviation SD or σ, equal to the square root of the variance. Variance D(X)=(SD)² or σ²;

σ = √D(X) or ✓Var(X),

Sigmas have dimensions

random variable and its

deviations. Here are the numbers of spins.

If np > 5 and n(1 - p) > 5, then the binomial distribution is close to normal.

Variance for a single number over 370 throws

ball, D≈9, and for equal chances 10 times more! D≈92.

It is clear that the average expected

the number drop here is 10, and the color is 180. Anything that goes beyond ±3σ, three sigma, is outside the norm.

All ladies do it. And

gentlemen too, no doubt. 😉 But the topic seems to be taboo, especially here.

Namely: all players try

to guess something, to choose, usually - to foresee. This is the essence, meaning and

the benefits of gambling even for

losers. People against their will

are improving in many ways

directions. But it is better to do

it's deliberate. For example,

studying and training some

human superpowers.

What is considered impossible,

is being studied quite intensively by psychologists.

There are a lot of resources available about this.

articles in scientific journals.

Personal experiments based on information from books, articles and

Videos can open the player to new methods or combinations of methods.

Casinos, by the way, provide

such a development. Before the appearance

casinos are always winners

there were swindlers, fraudsters. This

already confirms the plot

ancient Mahabharata.

On the problems with honesty and

control in the casino is possible

read in James Swain books.

So, you can add it to your arsenal

feel free to add methods based on

foresight, radiestesia and even

psychokinesis. And that's the minimum.

In our time, the fair social principle "from each according to his ability, to each according to his work" is quite acceptable and feasible.