2 weeks ago
Have you explained to them that the transactions aren’t gambling related if they’re showing up from a books merchant or similar?
0
Have you explained to them that the transactions aren’t gambling related if they’re showing up from a books merchant or similar?
Yes and they say because I got coin on the site I’ve received goods. Even tho it doesn’t match up with the goods they are classing it because I’ve been very forthcoming with it all that I got what I intended to pay for.
Same they took.12 weeks with mine but shot themselves in foot as I was told over phone that the case was definitely closed even though it was showing open on my account and a customer service advisor said no it's definitely closed but someone keeps raising it but it will keep getting rejected. Then I get email saying it's still being investigated then a phone call 3 weeks later from the fraud investigation officer who said he was investigating it and would call me back on the tue with a outcome obviously rejected .but in the beginning it was raised as fraud then they rejected it but said they would raise it as chargebacks and I had to fill out forms for items not received and send all correspondence to them I have attempted with the merchants .they said in final response letter we have concluded our investigation and we are not refunding you this was not a scam the dispute was not raised as scam but chargeback .I also had gambiling blocks and international payments on my account at time .the bank needed to provide information from evidence from.merchants to prove otherwise and they didn't. My case is now with FOS I honestly don't even think santander investigated they have an awful trustpioilot reviews
Oh man it’s all to familiar please do let me know if you get anywhere with Fos my fingers are crossed for you. But the banks seem to make us feel like the criminals.
yes they send me an email pretty quickly stating they do not recognise my personality and directed me to get refund from the bank. It’s like they know the banks will side with them!
Ok I think if it is bigger amounts they do it as they cannot chance paying it all out !
Oh I would of thought the opposite because what’s a few hundred to them I thought thousands will be less likely to be paid because of losing more cash. If that makes sense!
Well if it is £3500 thats nothing to them to pay out but over £10000 a lot more and interest so they do them as its a big hit if they raise the chargebacks they cost them nothing they are simply reversing payments but its in there interests if a big amount as if they lose to the ombudsman they cover it all
I have just been reading Google terms and conditions as I thought ,hang on Google.are partly to blame for this also for allowing unlicensed offshore operators to advertise in restricted countries .If Google upheld the law because you can only search for certain domains from certain countries or you don't get access,well what intreating read . Gambiling sites need a valid licence and need to provide Google these licenses and also are not allowed to promote or operate in restricted countries or advertise if they do so Google can and will shut down their domains .But what I can't understand is half of these Gambiling sites do not hold any licence like costa rica they do not hold licence but the companies are registered this means swfa.and not worth the paper it's written on its an interesting read .My thoughts are Google should also be held responsible for allowing these sites to advertise without due diligence and checking their validity on licence . Penalties need paying
I have tried several times, they just reply that it is not their responsibility that the companies they cooperate with use a different MCC code and the like.
Jag har försökt flera gånger, dom svarar bara att det inte är deras ansvar att bolagen som dom sammarbetar med använder annan MCC kod och liknande.
Free professional educational courses for online casino employees aimed at industry best practices, improving player experience, and fair approach to gambling.
An initiative we launched with the goal to create a global self-exclusion system, which will allow vulnerable players to block their access to all online gambling opportunities.
A platform created to showcase all of our efforts aimed at bringing the vision of a safer and more transparent online gambling industry to reality.
An ambitious project whose goal is to celebrate the greatest and the most responsible companies in iGaming and give them the recognition they deserve.
Casino.guru is an independent source of information about online casinos and online casino games, not controlled by any gambling operator. All our reviews and guides are created honestly, according to the best knowledge and judgement of the members of our independent expert team; however, they are intended for informative purposes only and should not be construed as, nor relied upon as, legal advice. You should always make sure that you meet all regulatory requirements before playing in any selected casino. Copyright ©2024
Check your inbox and click the link we sent to:
youremail@gmail.com
The link will expire in 72 hours.
Check your 'Spam' or 'Promotions' folder or click the button below.
Confirmation e-mail has been sent again.
Check your inbox and click the link we sent to: youremail@gmail.com
The link will expire in 72 hours.
Check your 'Spam' or 'Promotions' folder or click the button below.
Confirmation e-mail has been sent again.