I dare to disagree with what you write. If we protected the casinos like that, then we wouldn't have to have any resolution center and we wouldn't try to help the players at all, because according to your logic, we would be fighting each other, isn't that right?
We try to approach things fair and square and do not take sides with anyone.
In terms of reviews, each one is dealt with by a dedicated team, I'm one of the people who handles user reviews, and we certainly have procedures in place to resolve them. So when a review is rejected for something, there's always a reason given. We don't have a problem with a negative user review, but it has to have meaningful value as well. To give an example, if a player describes that they were dissatisfied, withdrawals took a long time, KYC was difficult to handle, support was not helpful, games had low RTP according to the player, and various other things are fine. However, if he comes into the game saying that he put $100 into the casino and didn't win anything, this review is pointless as it is not relevant and informative at all.
So that's it from my side.
So if I wrote a review on every casino and said to not play there because of transaction laundering, bypassing MCC codes, bypassing Visa/MC regulations, breaking several national and local regulations, you would be fine with it?
One would think that since these actions the casinos are doing, all these casinos should be blacklisted, as they are basically bypassing the only player protection there is, the 7995 gambling block. But I understand that you can't do it because that would really lower the amount of ok casinos on your site, there would be non left, except the properly licensed ones, such as UK/Sweden.
Anyways, it's ok, I don't expect you to do it, even though you really should 🙂