Hello,
I sympathize with all of the players affected by these delays, and your question is perfectly logical and valid. This is a very frequent question, not just in this thread.
I imagine how our responses would sound in such circumstances. I'll give it a shot anyway because I always strive to be open about our approach. We are fully aware of the situation because there have been far too many complaints with the same patterns. As we began to investigate further, we discovered that the responses and efforts from the casino/affiliate group had become quite inconsistent and somewhat unstable, while complaints continued to accumulate. This raises a pressing question: how can we "punish" the casino without jeopardizing the fragile communication channel that has provided, albeit delayed, resolutions for players with active complaints? Well, we haven't found the ideal solution. Nonetheless, we decided that risking the possibility of remaining in contact with the casino was not worth it. Instead, we chose persuasion and diplomacy. I know it sounds like we are aware of the casino's wrath; I understand that, but the real fear is losing control over resolving associated complaints.
That is still pretty much the real problem we all face...
As I previously stated, I understand how it may sound from your perspective. We are about to challenge this question again as soon as our most important experts return from vacation. It should be within the next week, I suppose.
I will do my best to provide more information as it becomes available.
Automatic translation: