1 year ago
That's exactly how it is. I would have welcomed it if the total ban had remained.
Automatic translation:
Execution Pokerstars. Apparently, payment is not voluntary (page 63)
1 year ago
Have any of you had any experience with Betway?
count the?
Automatic translation:
1 year ago
Betway offers comparisons but only in very small quantities. They recently suffered a bitter defeat at the Cologne Higher Regional Court. It was about €180,000 approx.
Now this case is before the Federal Court because Betway NZB has lodged an appeal. The numbers will come sooner or later. Don't forget: Money plays absolutely no role at sports betting providers and casinos. Everything is available in abundance. The player is only deliberately humiliated, worn down and played for time.
Edited
Automatic translation:
1 year ago
The next video from G&L will be online at 6 p.m
Automatic translation:
1 year ago
I'm curious. May I ask where the information comes from?
Automatic translation:
1 year ago
I feel it in my urine
Automatic translation:
1 year ago
Lol, the BGH will not allow the appeal because it is not permissible, etc. It's all just a game of time and the nerves of the players. For every casino, the drops in Germany and Austria are sucked, to the detriment of the casinos, ohhhhhhh, I'm sorry 🤣🤣🤣🤣😊😊😊😊😊😊.
Automatic translation:
1 year ago
A second case is now pending at the Federal Court of Justice on the subject. This is a non-admission complaint against the judgment of the OLG Hamm 21 O 116/21 . The losing casino operator appealed to the BGH to the effect that the appeal should be allowed. Even if this procedure is not a "real appeal", the BGH will have to deal with the relevant legal questions in order to allow the appeal or not to allow it. The proceedings are being conducted at BGH I ZR 53/23.
Automatic translation:
1 year ago
😀
1 year ago
If the proceedings are suspended until the ECJ ruling, how long are we talking about? Is there a rough estimate?
Automatic translation:
1 year ago
Hope not more than 30 years 😉...good mood today
Automatic translation:
1 year ago
Did some research. End of 2024, more likely beginning of 2025.
Automatic translation:
1 year ago
Do you currently mean purely the revisions or also the model procedures in Malta?
What's also strange is that with so many procedures there are always Status Proof Plaintiff... then 2 months later again and again and then nothing is done anymore and the procedure is decided in such a way that nothing happens haha
Automatic translation:
1 year ago
No, I mean the ECJ. Malta had asked certain questions.
More procedures are currently being suspended.
Automatic translation:
1 year ago
So I have the information that the ECJ has to respond within 16 or 18 months.
Automatic translation:
1 year ago
Just found !
Automatic translation:
1 year ago
Interesting. The exact problem would also be interesting.
Automatic translation:
1 year ago
Found.....with reservations!!
"Statistically speaking, a preliminary ruling procedure at the ECJ runs for a good 16 months from receipt of the application. Assuming that the application is submitted at the end of May, you can quickly calculate how long a decision will take."
Automatic translation:
ReplyQuote1
1 year ago
Is it actually known that this whole thing with the suspension of proceedings by the ECJ can also be traced back to the casino lawyers' self-constructed sham proceedings?
Example: European Lotto and Betting Ltd where an attorney appointed by the casino industry suddenly bought the claim and then sued Malta to ensure that the legal questions were submitted to the ECJ in order to suspend all ongoing proceedings for years?!
Who is actually going to put this w1chs3r in jail?
Automatic translation:
1 year ago
Well then the casino should never stand in its own way if the lawyer gets the money back for themselves and the player was stupid enough to sell it 😂
shows even more that they simply try everything and want every euro back in their coffers, by any means possible
Automatic translation:
Add post
