Execution Pokerstars. Apparently, payment is not voluntary (page 117)

Hey, as silly as it sounds, I'm going to have a drink with you upstairs. There have been good times and bad, and I think we should post all the information in the forum so we're better informed ourselves... for our own conscience and understanding!

all the best to you!!

I have a judgment that became final before Bill 55 was passed. Does this have any benefits or not?

I also have a previous judgment, and that doesn't change anything. For years, executions have been unsuccessful in Malta.

Please don't be mad at me - I asked your poker lawyer...what you wrote is complete bullshit...I don't know why you're doing that but...tjo



https://www.pokerfirma.com/casino-news/merkur-datenskandal-verhindert-bill-55-traffen/909597

Gerhard P.'s case has now been re-entered at eCourt. What's this all about?

Appeal from 1 judgment.

Under Gerhard p. I can't find anyone, could you tell me who he is suing

Appeal against the initial judgment.

Against TSG

Does anyone know of a litigation funder that accepts casinos from Curacao?

They're all already insolvent - no one pays there even without bill55, and that's why everything went wrong.

So I don't think GG Poker is insolvent

As far as I know, in Malta?

And I meant the PF, they didn't see any money but sank quite a lot...

But now that the WSOP has also left TSG, they're the next to go bankrupt... Everything has been moved to GG. So PStars will soon be gone. Sponsorships have also been withdrawn everywhere, and GG is now emerging as the market leader. You just have to watch closely and download the financial statements. All clear? That's it for TSG.

Breaking news 9:02 a.m.

According to my lawyer, the ECJ will rule that the damage did not occur in Austria. That's the proposal for May. Therefore, he sees the chances of executions still being possible dwindling.

Regarding playing for time, that means another 2-3 years and yes, he also sees strong trends like TSG and the postponement of deals in order to no longer be able to pay.

That seems to be the bad news…

TSG had enough time to position themselves.

I've long since given up hope. Long live the law!

I'm from Germany, but that probably doesn't change anything. I'm seriously considering whether to accept the settlement (if that's even still possible).

What would that mean specifically? The damage wouldn't have occurred in Austria, and then what?

This means that the damage did not occur in Austria and therefore occurred in the respective country, i.e. Malta, etc. Consequently, the local courts have jurisdiction and not those in Austria.