I see how you are trying to justify yourself and this company. Just because you make up these "safety indexes" based on different metrics that you make up doesn't mean that the casino is legitimate. One of your metrics is based on player reviews, at least half of the reviews are negative, yet you still have a high rating. The casino is relatively new and not established, yet still a high rating. The owner has been around longer, but also have a lot of poor reviews, yet still a high rating.
You can continue to try and tell others, and maybe yourself, that you are doing nothing wrong by promoting a shady site like Drip Casino. And continue to say "every player has the option not to play in the casino. No one is forced to deposit money." Does that help you justify what you are doing?
If a bank was being shot up by robbers and someone was about to walk in would you tell them not to go in or would you open the door for them in hope the robbers would give you a commission?
You are just as culpable as these sites and yes what you are doing is not illegal but it surely isn't the right thing to do. People rely on review sites to try and weed out the many shady sites like Drip, and when these review sites are in relationships and getting paid commissions from these sites the the integrity is lost.
If you do in fact make money on player losses, like you said you do, I guess it would be in your best interest to funnel players to a site where the losses would occur more frequently than maybe a more legitimate site. Hmm.
Nothing is going to change with this reply I am writing but hopefully you see and maybe a couple of other people see what you are doing is wrong, no matter how you try and spin it.
Automatic translation: