Isn't that reason indeed terrible?
Yes, I like blackjack and I play it a lot, but what do you mean by abuse?
I chose to play blackjack with this provider because of the following reasons.
The betting limit is high. Other games have a lower limit, like $100.
I bet $500 a time on blackjack, which limits the number of blackjack providers.
The speed of the game is fast. I don't like live blackjack because of its slow pace. I prefer to play video games that are fast-paced.
The provider is well-known and reliable in Japan.
For the above reasons, I only played blackjack because it was the only game I could find that had high stakes and the fastest speed.
I don't think it is possible to abuse the famous card counting due to the nature of the video game.
I was just playing a game that you had prepared.
I've been playing other games as well, and I think the main reasons for the increase in my balance this time were the $600 slot jackpot for free spins, the $20,000 jackpot on a $200 Crazy Time bet, and the $60,000 jackpot I won on a single $100 Plinko's high risk.
I can only think that the casino is trying to confiscate my big win this time for some appropriate reason.
Gambling is about enjoying luck. It is too much to confiscate just because a player happened to win by volatility.
Even if there is some problem with blackjack, as the casino claims, players have no way of knowing the programming of the games offered by the provider. Rather, they have to play with the belief that all games, whether live, slots, or video, are always fair. I believe that's what casinos are for, to believe that and enjoy winning by luck.
I think it is wrong to blame the player for the provider's mistakes just because he/she believes and plays the games provided by the BCgame side.
You mentioned abusing the bonuses, is it abusing the fact that you got a lot of bonuses? BCgame's VIP system is that if you bet a lot, you get a bonus in proportion to that. How can you claim extra bonuses? It would be impossible.
If that's the theory, would higher VIPs than me be treated in the same way?
My claim is that I was just playing the game I liked, trusting that it was fair.
If there was some mistake in the game, it is the provider's or casino's responsibility.
If there is a machine that falls under the reasons I chose the above in the first place, I would play other blackjack games. That's all I could find in my search.
If you blame the player for the problematic game, then everything you believed to be fair is destroyed.
There should be no mistakes in a game that is offered through a vetting agency.
I believe that we are releasing games because they have been reviewed and deemed fair.
If there was a problem with something that had been reviewed, did you make any changes to it after the review and release it?
The casino sends the bonuses according to the rules of BCgame's VIP system, so there is no way that players can claim them illegally.
The balance increase this time was mostly due to jackpots won in games other than blackjack. I didn't only play blackjack.
Dear Casino Guru.
Am I wrong in my assertion?
Translated with DeepL.com (free version)
Isn't that reason indeed terrible?
Yes, I like blackjack and I play it a lot, but what do you mean by abuse?
I chose to play blackjack with this provider because of the following reasons.
The betting limit is high. Other games have a lower limit, like $100.
I bet $500 a time on blackjack, which limits the number of blackjack providers.
The speed of the game is fast. I don't like live blackjack because of its slow pace. I prefer to play video games that are fast-paced.
The provider is well-known and reliable in Japan.
For the above reasons, I only played blackjack because it was the only game I could find that had high stakes and the fastest speed.
I don't think it is possible to abuse the famous card counting due to the nature of the video game.
I was just playing a game that you had prepared.
I've been playing other games as well, and I think the main reasons for the increase in my balance this time were the $600 slot jackpot for free spins, the $20,000 jackpot on a $200 Crazy Time bet, and the $60,000 jackpot I won on a single $100 Plinko's high risk.
I can only think that the casino is trying to confiscate my big win this time for some appropriate reason.
Gambling is about enjoying luck. It is too much to confiscate just because a player happened to win by volatility.
Even if there is some problem with blackjack, as the casino claims, players have no way of knowing the programming of the games offered by the provider. Rather, they have to play with the belief that all games, whether live, slots, or video, are always fair. I believe that's what casinos are for, to believe that and enjoy winning by luck.
I think it is wrong to blame the player for the provider's mistakes just because he/she believes and plays the games provided by the BCgame side.
You mentioned abusing the bonuses, is it abusing the fact that you got a lot of bonuses? BCgame's VIP system is that if you bet a lot, you get a bonus in proportion to that. How can you claim extra bonuses? It would be impossible.
If that's the theory, would higher VIPs than me be treated in the same way?
My claim is that I was just playing the game I liked, trusting that it was fair.
If there was some mistake in the game, it is the provider's or casino's responsibility.
If there is a machine that falls under the reasons I chose the above in the first place, I would play other blackjack games. That's all I could find in my search.
If you blame the player for the problematic game, then everything you believed to be fair is destroyed.
There should be no mistakes in a game that is offered through a vetting agency.
I believe that we are releasing games because they have been reviewed and deemed fair.
If there was a problem with something that had been reviewed, did you make any changes to it after the review and release it?
The casino sends the bonuses according to the rules of BCgame's VIP system, so there is no way that players can claim them illegally.
The balance increase this time was mostly due to jackpots won in games other than blackjack. I didn't only play blackjack.
Dear Casino Guru.
Am I wrong in my assertion?
Translated with DeepL.com (free version)