HomeComplaintsZonaGioco Casino - The player's self exclusion failed.

ZonaGioco Casino - The player's self exclusion failed.

Amount: €1,500

ZonaGioco Casino
Safety Index:Above average
Submitted: 15 Aug 2022 | Case closed : 27 Sep 2022
Case closed Our verdict

Unjustified complaint

REJECTED

Case summary

1 year ago

The player's self exclusion failed as he was able to open a new account. The complaint was rejected as the player did not follow the casino terms during his request.

Public
Public
1 year ago
Translation

Greetings,

on 28 July 2022 I sent by email the request for the permanent closure of the gaming account and without the possibility of it being reopened in the future in my name, under penalty of reimbursement of any lost deposits.

The casino closed the gaming account on the same day but allowed me today on August 15th to reopen a new one with the same data, email and telephone number. I lost 1500 € which I am requesting a refund as my July request not to open any other accounts in my name at this casino was not respected.

In all the ADM casinos in which I have made this type of request in the past, they have put my tax code on the black list, not giving me the possibility to open other accounts in the future. This casino, on the other hand, did not carry out this procedure, causing me to lose another 1500 euros which I am requesting a refund.

Thanks for collaboration.

file

Automatic translation:
Public
Public
1 year ago

Hello carsix79,

Thank you very much for submitting your complaint. I’m sorry to hear about your problem. Please allow me to ask you a few questions, so I can understand the whole situation completely. Could you please advise what reason you have given when requesting to block your account?

Please, let me explain you what the difference between closing the account and self-exclusion is:

Some casinos use lots of tools for responsible gambling and I would not mention them here. What players can do if they’re unhappy in the casino: Close the account or self-exclude themselves, those are the two basic choices.


Closing an account is simple and has almost no impact - the player can reopen account anytime, and casino has no obligation to the player.


On the other hand, self-exclusion does. If a player successfully makes a self-exclusion, the casino agrees not to open this account or if yes only under particular circumstances (after cooling off period and this cannot be done for players who are addicted/with gambling problem).


In the case of self-exclusion, if casino failed in this, player may ask for a refund.


Thank you very much in advance for your reply.

Best regards,

Nick

Private
Private
1 year ago
Translation
Sensitive information

This post has been made private by Casino Guru. It contains sensitive information meant to be seen only by the involved parties.

Public
Public
1 year ago

Dear carsix79,

Unfortunately that is not how it works. If you did not mention gambling issues or addiction the casino had no reason to self exclude you. You can't just made up your own rules and state them to casino and expect them to follow it.

The complaint will be now closed as it is unjustified. Please be sure to request for account closure/self exclusion according to the casino's terms next time instead of making up your own ones.

Best regards,

Nick

flash-message-reviews
User reviews – Write own casino reviews and share your experience
Forum_alt
Join the discussion on our Forum and meet casino players from all over the world
scamalert_1_alt
Casino Guru employees will never ask for your password or seek access to your casino or bank account.
Follow us on social media – Daily posts, no deposit bonuses, new slots, and more
Subscribe to our newsletter for newest no deposit bonuses, new slots, and other news