I appreciate your prompt response regarding my complaint. However, I am still seeking a clear resolution based on the legal framework governing online gambling in Germany, particularly under the new Interstate Treaty on Online Gambling (GlüStV 2021) which took effect on July 1, 2021, and the subsequent implementation of the OASIS self-exclusion system on August 2, 2021.
As per the complaint, I self-excluded from Vulkanvegas due to a gambling addiction but was able to open a new account with the same information and play games. This appears to be a violation of the self-exclusion provisions aimed at protecting individuals from gambling-related harms.
I understand that the legal landscape regarding online gambling and self-exclusion has evolved with the new treaty. Therefore, I am keen on understanding the obligations of the casino in complying with self-exclusion requests and the provisions for refunds to self-excluded players, as stipulated under the new law and the OASIS self-exclusion system.
Furthermore, I am aware that there have been recovery claims in Germany where players have sought to reclaim their stakes from private operators, as noted in the recent updates on German Gaming Law. However, the legal stance on refunds for self-excluded players remains unclear.
I would appreciate it if you could provide further clarity on the casino's obligations and the legal recourse available to me as a self-excluded player, especially in light of the recent regulatory changes. Your guidance will be invaluable in helping me understand the next steps in pursuing my refund claim.
Thank you for your continued assistance.
I appreciate your prompt response regarding my complaint. However, I am still seeking a clear resolution based on the legal framework governing online gambling in Germany, particularly under the new Interstate Treaty on Online Gambling (GlüStV 2021) which took effect on July 1, 2021, and the subsequent implementation of the OASIS self-exclusion system on August 2, 2021.
As per the complaint, I self-excluded from Vulkanvegas due to a gambling addiction but was able to open a new account with the same information and play games. This appears to be a violation of the self-exclusion provisions aimed at protecting individuals from gambling-related harms.
I understand that the legal landscape regarding online gambling and self-exclusion has evolved with the new treaty. Therefore, I am keen on understanding the obligations of the casino in complying with self-exclusion requests and the provisions for refunds to self-excluded players, as stipulated under the new law and the OASIS self-exclusion system.
Furthermore, I am aware that there have been recovery claims in Germany where players have sought to reclaim their stakes from private operators, as noted in the recent updates on German Gaming Law. However, the legal stance on refunds for self-excluded players remains unclear.
I would appreciate it if you could provide further clarity on the casino's obligations and the legal recourse available to me as a self-excluded player, especially in light of the recent regulatory changes. Your guidance will be invaluable in helping me understand the next steps in pursuing my refund claim.
Thank you for your continued assistance.