Dear Joshuag,
Nick provided me with relevant evidence that fully supports his claims.
After gathering all the necessary information and details, we are closing this complaint as unjustified due to breaching the casino's terms and conditions, specifically bonus rules (explained in more detail above) - the disputed winnings were accumulated from a no-deposit bonus, and you used several consecutive bonuses without making deposits to separate them. According to the casino's terms and conditions you accepted upon registration, it is prohibited, and the winnings were considered invalid. In addition, you provided us with misleading information (referring to your "Depositor" status even though the status was given to your account only because the winnings from one of the previously used no-deposit bonuses were converted to your real money/withdrawable balance, so you even did not make any deposit there), and, although it was not supported by evidence - even if the rules had not been breached, your balance was lost by playing in the end, as Nick mentioned. The casino acted correctly and in accordance with its terms and conditions.
As for Ruby Slots and Casino Brango... Ruby Slots has the same rules and they apply the bonus rules in the same way as Slots Madness; if you do not carefully read the Bonus Terms and Conditions in Casino Brango (I closed one complaint with them recently), or you breach their bonus terms, they will not pay you the winnings either, I am sure. So just more misleading information.
Honestly, I would rather classify this complaint as "shady practices" and/or "scam". So that is what we agree on - let others know about it.
In case of any questions, feel free to write to me at branislav.b@casino.guru.
Thank you very much, Nick and Slot Madness Team, for providing information and for your cooperation!
Best regards,
Branislav, Casino.Guru
Dear Joshuag,
Nick provided me with relevant evidence that fully supports his claims.
After gathering all the necessary information and details, we are closing this complaint as unjustified due to breaching the casino's terms and conditions, specifically bonus rules (explained in more detail above) - the disputed winnings were accumulated from a no-deposit bonus, and you used several consecutive bonuses without making deposits to separate them. According to the casino's terms and conditions you accepted upon registration, it is prohibited, and the winnings were considered invalid. In addition, you provided us with misleading information (referring to your "Depositor" status even though the status was given to your account only because the winnings from one of the previously used no-deposit bonuses were converted to your real money/withdrawable balance, so you even did not make any deposit there), and, although it was not supported by evidence - even if the rules had not been breached, your balance was lost by playing in the end, as Nick mentioned. The casino acted correctly and in accordance with its terms and conditions.
As for Ruby Slots and Casino Brango... Ruby Slots has the same rules and they apply the bonus rules in the same way as Slots Madness; if you do not carefully read the Bonus Terms and Conditions in Casino Brango (I closed one complaint with them recently), or you breach their bonus terms, they will not pay you the winnings either, I am sure. So just more misleading information.
Honestly, I would rather classify this complaint as "shady practices" and/or "scam". So that is what we agree on - let others know about it.
In case of any questions, feel free to write to me at branislav.b@casino.guru.
Thank you very much, Nick and Slot Madness Team, for providing information and for your cooperation!
Best regards,
Branislav, Casino.Guru
Edited by a Casino Guru admin