Slot Madness Casino Review

The player from the US had requested a withdrawal two weeks prior. Despite having a verified account and assurances from the casino, no withdrawal had been processed. The player was dissatisfied with the delay beyond the promised timescale. The issue was resolved after the casino sent the payment. The complaint was closed as ‘resolved’ in our system.

The VIP player from Puerto Rico had redeemed a special coupon for $100 free play and, after fulfilling the wagering requirements, requested a cash out. The casino denied the withdrawal on the basis that the player had redeemed a free bonus before. The player admitted to having used multiple no-deposit bonuses consecutively, which the casino's terms prohibit. After reviewing the evidence provided by the casino, we confirmed that the casino's decision to deny the withdrawal was in accordance with their terms and conditions. Therefore, the complaint was rejected.

The player from Virginia had been struggling for four months to withdraw $2500 of her $3000 winnings. She tried to process the withdrawal through four different banks (USAA, Atlantic Union Bank, Wells Fargo Bank, and Capital One Bank), at the suggestion of the casino representatives. However, despite going through the process with each bank and waiting each time, every withdrawal attempt failed. The Complaints Team engaged with the casino, which initially cited issues with the provided bank accounts. Eventually, the casino approved a bank wire transfer, but the player still did not receive the funds. Due to a lack of response from the player, the complaint was ultimately rejected.

The player from California was unable to withdraw a $60 winning. Despite being KYC approved and allegedly complying with the rules, the casino falsely accused the player of using a free chip, which is not reflected in the transaction history. The player believed the casino was just making excuses to withhold the winnings. The casino later explained the situation and provided us with evidence supporting that the user managed to accumulate the disputed winnings from multiple consecutive no-deposit bonuses without making deposits to separate them, breaching the casino's bonus rules, while the complainant also provided us with misleading information during the complaint process and basically lost the disputed funds by playing. The complaint was closed as unjustified.

The player from Indiana had been waiting for a month to withdraw over $7,000 from various affiliated casinos. Despite some small progress having been made and alternative payment methods having been suggested, such as opening a new bank account or using cryptocurrencies, the majority of the withdrawals were still pending. The player simply wanted to receive his winnings. He had confirmed that his account was verified weeks before and he had used bonus money to accumulate his winnings. The player had faced issues with his bank not being approved for wire transfers, which led him to open a new account. Some of his withdrawals had been returned to his balance due to failed attempts, and he had had to resubmit them. The player also reported having been labeled as a restricted player due to his winnings at an affiliated casino. Eventually, he lost all his pending withdrawals, totaling $12,000, in one day. We concluded that due to the player losing all the balance, the complaint would now be rejected.

The player from the United States had applied for a $200 chip promo from Slot Madness, which had a $6000 playthrough. After fulfilling this requirement, he had expected to make a withdrawal but was denied by support. The player had claimed to have completed all necessary verifications and believed he had made deposits in the past. However, he was only granted a $100 withdrawal instead of the $2693 he had won. We had asked him to confirm whether he activated several no-deposit bonuses in a row and to provide transaction and bonus history. However, the player failed to respond to our requests, and we were unable to investigate further. The complaint was therefore rejected.

The player from the US had experienced issues with a withdrawal from an online casino. After meeting a playthrough amount of 6,000 dollars, the player had been left with a 100 dollars max cash out, which the casino initially refused to pay. Despite fulfilling verification requirements and making a mandatory deposit, the player had not received a response about the withdrawal request. We had engaged with both the player and the casino to understand and resolve the issue. The casino had identified that the withdrawal was denied due to a lack of payout details. The player then resubmitted the withdrawal request with the necessary details. The casino confirmed that the payment had been processed and delivered via Bitcoin. The player confirmed the receipt of the payment, thus resolving the issue.

The player from the United States had faced an issue with logging into his casino account due to unrecognized credentials. Despite our attempts to communicate with him and requests for additional details to assist in resolving the issue, the player did not respond. As a result, we were unable to investigate the issue further and had to reject the complaint.

The player from California had been experiencing a withdrawal delay for approximately two months. Despite having provided the required information, the casino kept delaying the process by asking for more details, such as a Bitcoin address. We attempted to investigate the issue, but due to the player's lack of response to our inquiries, we were unable to proceed with the investigation. As a result, the complaint was rejected.

The player from Canada disputed accusations from the casino that he had violated their rules by redeeming more than one free chip and holding multiple accounts. The player denied these and had already passed verification and made a deposit. However, the casino had provided evidence showing that the player had indeed violated their terms and conditions by having multiple accounts and using consecutive no-deposit bonuses without making a deposit in between (a no-deposit bonus was used in his first/previous account). After reviewing the evidence, we concluded that the casino's decision to confiscate the player's winnings and refund his deposit was justified.

The player from Kansas had requested a withdrawal prior to submitting this complaint. Unfortunately, her winnings hadn't been received yet. The player had used bitcoin for her withdrawal and was informed it would be denied. She had accumulated her winnings of $550 from a previous play balance of $9. She was required to pay $30 in bitcoin as a withdrawal fee. After reviewing the case, we had determined that the casino was within their rights to confiscate her winnings due to a violation of their bonus terms. As a result, the complaint had been rejected.

The player from South Carolina had completed the verification process multiple times in an attempt to withdraw $650. Despite receiving a case number and assurances of contact within 72 hours, the player had not received a response or the money. After the Complaints Team intervened, they discovered that the player's winnings resulted from the 4th consecutive free chip used without a cash deposit, which was against the casino's terms and conditions. As a result, the player's complaint was rejected.

The player from Japan had had issues with prolonged withdrawal delays from Slot Madness Casino, despite having provided the necessary documents. The player had not received any updates from the casino's finance manager. After the player's complaint had been escalated and the casino had been invited to respond, the casino had confirmed that the payment had been issued to their third-party payment providers for disbursal as a wire transfer. The player later confirmed that the issue had been resolved and the funds had been received. We had marked the complaint as 'resolved'.

The player from the US had issues with the verification process due to a stolen card. Despite having contacted representatives and provided necessary documents, the verification was still pending. The player wanted to remove the card from their account to continue playing. The casino had requested an official document from the bank, which the player was unable to provide because the card had been issued by Cash App. Despite the player having provided screenshots of communication with Cash App stating they couldn't provide the document, the casino insisted on receiving an official statement from the issuing bank. The player had become frustrated with the process and accused the casino of deleting their winnings. However, the casino had provided evidence showing the player had lost their balance while playing. The player then requested to close the complaint and their account. We had confirmed the player's game history and found their accusations to be untrue. The complaint was then rejected as per the player's request.

The player had used a bonus and met the necessary conditions for a withdrawal. After verifying her identity, the casino had informed her that she could not withdraw her winnings in her country unless she made a deposit and played with it. The Complaints Team had suggested she make a verification deposit to determine if the withdrawal could be honored, assuring her that this deposit was refundable. However, the player did not respond to the team's messages and queries, hence the complaint was rejected due to lack of further investigation.

A player from Missouri has been unable to reach the online casino platform for withdrawing money due to a domain issue and non-existent email address. The complaint was rejected as the player stopped responding.

The player from Indiana was struggling with a withdrawal process that had surpassed the stated timeframe and had $7800 pending in their account. The casino kept asking her to resubmit the withdrawal and reverify her information, including her bitcoin address. She had received a part of her winnings, but the casino delayed the remaining payments. We had invited the casino to respond to the complaint, but they only promised to release the final payment. The player stopped responding to our messages, so we had to reject the complaint due to lack of cooperation.

The player from the United States requested a withdrawal three weeks ago. Despite submitting the required verification documents (driver's license and proof of address), he has not heard back from the casino. Additionally, the casino’s live support isn't functioning and emails go unanswered exceeding the mentioned response time. The casino representative provided us with supporting evidence that no withdrawal was requested and player played all their funds. We have rejected the complaint as we are unable to assist further.

The player from Texas had been attempting to make a withdrawal for approximately four months. After being requested for numerous documents and an appropriate bank, his account access was blocked. The player opened two more bank accounts in an attempt to expedite the withdrawal but failed. He then asked for a check payout, after which he lost access to his account. Following communication between the complaints team and the casino, it was disclosed that the player's account was suspended due to threats of disputing deposits with his bank. The casino confirmed that a payment was made via check. The player acknowledged receiving a check but was initially oblivious that it was from the casino. However, the check was declined by the player's bank due to problems with the company name on the check. Despite numerous attempts to resolve the issue, the casino did not provide the requested evidence, leading to the complaint being closed as 'unresolved'.

The player from Malta had received a bonus, completed the wagering, and ended up with an $830 balance, which was reduced to $1 despite a max cashout rule of $100. The player was seeking an explanation. The Complaints Team had tried to clarify if the player had made any real money deposits between the free bonuses as per the casino's rules. However, due to the lack of response from the player to the team's inquiries, we were unable to proceed with the investigation or provide potential solutions. The complaint was consequently rejected.

The player from Louisiana had encountered withdrawal issues with Slot Madness Casino. Despite her account having been active and verified, her attempts to withdraw her balance to Bitcoin had been denied due to a supposed "deposit discrepancy". The casino had stated that their 3rd party payment providers couldn't collect any of her cash deposits, including the winning deposit, which rendered the winnings ineligible for withdrawal. We had requested the player to provide her bank statements for review to identify the winning deposit. The player provided the required documents without any indication of deposit, leading us to reject the complaint due to a lack of necessary information.

The player from the United States deposited $30 and won $1000 but found only $.82 in their account the next day, allegedly due to a mistake by the casino's finance department. After a thorough investigation, we found out that the deposit never left the player's bank account. We understand the decision of the casino to void the player's winnings and the complaint was closed as rejected.

The player from South Africa has been waiting for a withdrawal for less than two weeks. Unfortunately, their payout hasn’t been received yet. The player was informed that the winnings were confiscated because two free bonuses were used consecutively and she decided to close the complaint.

The player from California requested a withdrawal three weeks ago, but it remains unprocessed despite multiple interactions with customer service. We closed the complaint because the player stopped responding.

The player from Ohio is not able to withdraw his winnings. The casino won't approve withdrawal without a crypto deposit for verification. Additionally, despite advertising a check payout method, this option is not visible on the website. The complaint was rejected because the player didn't respond to our messages and questions.

The player from the United States claimed a free bonus after their last deposit and won. However, the casino canceled the withdrawal stating the player redeemed two free bonuses consecutively, which the player disputes and believes there is an error in transaction history. The casino provided supporting evidence to back up their claims, so the player was happy for the complaint to be closed.

The player from the US claims his relative created an account in his name. The casino provided proof that there was another account registered using all of the same details as the player, and that this account had been used to claim multiple free bonuses. As the casino had acted in accordance with its terms and conditions regarding the use of multiple free bonuses in this case, the complaint was rejected.

The player from the US is experiencing difficulties withdrawing her winnings from the casino. There were multiple free chips used without deposit been made in the interim therefore the complaint has been rejected.

The player from the US was accused of activating multiple free chips consecutively. The casino confiscated her winnings. The complaint was rejected because the player didn't respond to our messages and questions.

The player from the United States has requested a withdrawal one month prior to submitting this complaint. Unfortunately, winnings haven’t been received yet. After reviewing evidence from the casino it turned out to be an unjustified complaint.

The player from the US requested a withdrawal more than two weeks prior to submitting this complaint. Unfortunately, the winnings haven’t been received yet. The complaint was rejected because the player didn't respond to our messages and questions.

The player complained about having multiple withdrawals delayed. Casino representative replied to complaint and informed the player about several payments issued, however, there were still a few more to come. There were no more updates since then.

The player signed up with Slot madness and received a $50 no deposit bonus. After completing wagering requirements, sending verification documents, and submitting a withdrawal request, the player received an email asking for their BTC wallet address. However, the withdrawal has still been denied, and as it turned out, they weren't able to withdraw in BTC at all. The player got stuck in circle of verification process, resubmitting necessary docs over and over again.

The player from the United States is struggling to verify. We contacted the casino and its representative pointed out that there've been some documents missing and offered to help with the verification process, but we haven't heard from the player since then. The complaint was rejected.

The player from Baden-Württemberg has been waiting for a withdrawal for less than two weeks. Unfortunately, their payout hasn’t been received yet. The complaint was rejected because the player didn't respond to our messages and questions.

The player from the US is experiencing difficulties withdrawing his winnings due to ongoing verification. We contacted Slot Madness, and the casino representative helped the player to figure out why the verification process was stuck. After submitting the required documents, the player got his account verified and finally received the winnings. The complaint got resolved.

The player from the United States is experiencing difficulties withdrawing his winnings due to ongoing verification. We rejected the complaint because the player didn't respond to our messages and questions.

The player from United States had requested a withdrawal five months ago. Unfortunately, it has not been received yet. The complaint was closed as resolved as the palyer received his winnings to his crypto wallet.

The player from Italy struggled to withdraw her winnings from a No-Deposit bonus due to a country restriction. The player was later allowed to finish the wagering requirement, therefore, the issue had been resolved, however, the complaint was rejected as the player played the refunded bonus amount down to zero.

The player requested a withdrawal and sent the documents for their account verification to the casino about 10 times and still haven't received the money. No other information is available. The complaint remains unsolved.

The player had waited for withdrawal for more than 5 months and ever since then, they won 5 more times wasn't allowed to request another withdrawal because their 1st request was still pending. The casino was not responding to this complaint. This payment is with unknown status as we didn't hear any explanation from the casino.

The casino had been prolonging the verification process, after the ID they asked for the passport, after giving them the passport the player was still waiting for the payment for an extremely long time. Every time during the live chat, the player was asked to email his documents all over again but this time to different email addresses. No response came to an official complaint.

After accusing the player of having duplicate accounts, the casino was not able to provide any evidence. The player had been waiting for 4 months for his payment of 200 USD but after placing an official complaint, the casino closed his account. An official statement from the casino said the player had a duplicate account. Unfortunately, we have not heard from the casino since then.

The player from Australia has been waiting for his withdrawals since February. The casino managed to look into the issue and the withdrawals started coming to the player. The complaint was closed as 'resolved' since the withdrawals seem to be working to the player's satisfaction.

The player from Australia had been waiting to have her withdrawal processed for almost a month before submitting the complaint. The issue was resolved. Three weeks later, the player informed us she had received her funds.

The player won A$10,000 on May 22nd, 2019. All documents and withdrawals have been accepted and approved by the casino, but she only received A$2,480 and is still waiting for the rest. The issue was successfully resolved.

The player from the United States had requested a withdrawal three weeks prior, with one approval for $2500 on 8/29. Despite being informed that it was marked as a priority and would take 3-7 days, there had been no update or response from the casino after multiple inquiries. The issue was resolved when the casino confirmed that the final payment had been issued to a third-party payment provider for disbursal, and the player subsequently received all his winnings. The complaint was marked as 'resolved' in the system after confirmation of receipt.

The player from Indiana had requested three withdrawals over the past three weeks, totaling $6,251. Despite providing all required documents for verification and having the payments approved, she was told that the withdrawals were pending final steps, with no clear explanation provided. We contacted the casino to clarify the status of the payments, and the casino confirmed that the last withdrawal was processed and pending transfer. After continued delays and communication, the player finally received her last payment, resolving the issue.

The player from Minnesota had requested a withdrawal which had been delayed for 2 weeks. Despite completing the requested verification process and having regular exchanges with the casino, the $700 payout via Bitcoin had yet to be processed. The Complaints Team facilitated communication between the player and the casino, resulting in the casino approving and expediting the payment. The player later confirmed receipt of the funds, resolving the issue.

The player from the US had experienced a delay in the processing of his bitcoin withdrawal of $335.21. The withdrawal request had been placed more than a month ago, but the online casino had not provided any definitive timeline or updates despite multiple inquiries from the player. After the complaint had been lodged, the casino responded stating that the withdrawal had been approved at $133 after deducting the provided bonus of $202. The player later confirmed receipt of two payments totaling $117.60, suspecting the difference from the approved amount was due to a processing fee. We had confirmed the possibility of a processing fee and marked the complaint as resolved after the player had received his funds.

The player from Ontario had been trying to withdraw his winnings, originally from a no-deposit bonus, since September 2023. Despite having followed all promotional rules and ensured the correct usage of the bonus, the casino kept delaying the payout, giving a waiting period of 2-10 business days each time. After the player's complaint, we asked the casino to provide an update on the status of the player’s withdrawal request. The casino representative had confirmed the player's Bitcoin address and escalated the withdrawal for payment. The player had then confirmed receipt of his funds, and we had marked the complaint as resolved.

The player from the United States had followed all the necessary steps to play through a bonus and cash out. However, her withdrawal of $120 had not been approved despite assurances from a casino representative. After the player raised a complaint, we had facilitated communication between her and the casino. The casino had requested additional documentation and confirmation of the player's Bitcoin address. The player had expressed concern about the safety of sharing her Bitcoin address and the history of her withdrawal requests being cancelled. We had assured her that her Bitcoin address would only be visible to us and the casino. Eventually, the player received her payment and expressed gratitude for our assistance. The issue had been successfully resolved.

The player from Germany had requested a withdrawal from the casino a month ago, but had not received the funds. The player had confirmed that he had met the sales requirements for a no deposit bonus and had deposited $10 in Bitcoin to verify the payment method. This had been his first time playing at this casino and he had not redeemed any bonuses before. The casino had responded that players from Germany were not allowed to cash out on free welcome chips but mentioned a recent Bitcoin transfer of $24. The situation had been reviewed by the casino's relevant department. The complaint had eventually been resolved successfully.

The player from Alaska has been waiting for his withdrawal for two weeks, and suspects the casino might refuse to pay. He is dealing with multiple withdrawals, and even though a couple are approved, he has not received any payment.

The player from Poland won $100 from a free chip but has been unable to contact the casino despite submitting all the required documents. The player confirmed the case was resolved, so we closed it accordingly.

The player from the United States has requested a withdrawal more than two weeks prior to submitting this complaint. Unfortunately, winnings haven’t been received yet. The issue has been resolved successfully.

The player from Indiana had been waiting for a withdrawal for less than two weeks. Unfortunately, their payout hadn’t been received yet. We contacted the casino and found out that 2 of 3 withdrawal requests were already processed, and the third one was about to be approved by the casino. After several days, the player confirmed receiving their winnings in full amount, so we closed the complaint as resolved.

The player from the United States is experiencing difficulties withdrawing her winnings due to ongoing verification. The player's account had been verified, and the player confirmed receipt of the payment.

The player from United States has requested a withdrawal more than three weeks ago. It has been pending since. Even if we’ve assumed that the issue has been resolved, without a confirmation from the player, we were forced to reject this complaint. The player contacted us once more, stating that the issue was not resolved, therefore we reopened this complaint to give it one more chance. The player got payed and the case is resolved.

The player from California had won a jackpot of $720 at Royal Ace casino on August 20 and had requested a withdrawal, which had not been processed a month later despite being told it would take 7-10 business days. After contacting the Complaints Team, it was confirmed that the payment had been sent to a third-party provider, and the player was informed that the transaction was forthcoming. Ultimately, the player confirmed that the withdrawal had been successful, and the issue was marked as resolved by the Complaints Team.

The player from Alabama had been waiting for a withdrawal for less than two weeks. Unfortunately, their payout hadn’t been received at that time. The Complaints Team had advised the player to wait at least 14 days after requesting their withdrawal before submitting a complaint. After two weeks, the player confirmed that he had received his payout of $50, which was the maximum payout for the no deposit bonus he had used. The issue had been resolved successfully and the complaint had been marked as 'resolved' by the Complaints Team.

The player from Texas has requested a withdrawal less than two weeks prior to submitting this complaint. The payment hasn’t been processed yet. The player later confirmed that the withdrawal was processed successfully, therefore we marked this complaint as resolved.

The player from the United States is having issues with login and withdrawal. After a deposit of $125, a software glitch prevented the player from accessing the game. Despite multiple password resets and emails to the support, the issue persists. Additionally, the casino has not processed a pending withdrawal of winnings worth $2500 despite numerous document submissions. The player later informed us that her winnings have been paid, so we closed the complaint as resolved.

The player from the United States faced issues with withdrawing money from the casino. Despite the rule stating a minimum cash out of $100 for monthly cash back, she received only $20, with the casino citing the use of Coindraw as the reason. The player questioned if different withdrawal methods had different rules and experienced delays in getting responses from customer service. The issue was resolved after the casino provided the remaining balance, allowing the player to put it back in withdrawal. The complaint was marked as resolved.

The player from Puerto Rico had struggled to withdraw her winnings from the casino for several months, despite having provided necessary documents repeatedly. The casino had continuously denied the payout due to supposedly missing documents. The withdrawal had eventually been approved on April 12, but the funds were not sent until May 11. After the player confirmed the receipt of her funds, we had marked the complaint as resolved.

The player from the United States had tried to make a withdrawal but was informed about missing documentation. Even though he provided all the requested documents, the casino kept asking for more information. The player had won the money without an active bonus. After the Complaints Team intervened, the Casino's Representative had confirmed that the player's account and bank transfer details were correct and that the withdrawal of $300 had been approved. However, the amount had included a non-cashable deposit bonus of $142, leaving the player with $158 to withdraw. This had been escalated for express disbursal. The player later confirmed receipt of the payment, and the complaint had been resolved.

The player from Kansas had requested two separate withdrawals from Slots Garden, totalling $2400. The casino had initially refused to pay her through Bitcoin, her preferred method because she hadn't deposited with Bitcoin. The casino had requested her bank details for a wire transfer, but later stated they couldn't send the money to her bank. The player had been unwilling to change her bank or open a second account to receive her winnings. After the intervention by us, the casino released the first portion of the withdrawal via Bitcoin and expedited the remaining payment. The player had confirmed receipt of her winnings and the issue had been successfully resolved.

The player from California had had an issue accessing her Slots Garden casino account via Inclave after accumulating about $1,400 in winnings. She had been unable to get in touch with Slots Garden or Inclave and had suspected foul play due to sudden device problems. We had to reject the complaint due to the player's lack of response to our messages and questions. However, the player later confirmed that the issue had been resolved.

The player from the United States had had issues withdrawing her $400 winnings from an online casino. Despite having submitted the required identification multiple times, her withdrawal had remained "in process" for over three weeks. The casino had clarified that the approved withdrawal amount was $130, accounting for a bonus and account confirmation deposit. Eventually, the player had received $116 of her winnings. The issue had been successfully resolved.

The player was facing issues with withdrawal. She had requested a payout of 880$ in Bitcoin, her payment method during the deposit. However, despite approval from the manager, the Bitcoin withdrawal was denied. It turned out it was a no-deposit bonus with a maximum cashout of $100 and a country restriction issue. Later, the complainant informed us that her issue was sorted out. The complaint is resolved.

The player from California has encountered problems with his withdrawal process despite verifying his account three times. He was promised a timeframe of 7 to 10 days which has extended, while communication with the casino remains the same. The issue of loyalty bonus limit was also raised. The complaint was resolved as the player's money got paid out.

The player from the United States had reported a delay in his withdrawal request since August 2nd. Despite having adhered to the casino's rules, his withdrawal request had remained unprocessed. He had confirmed that he was not a bonus abuser, as he had made numerous deposits and losses. The Complaints Team had asked for screenshots of his bonus and cashier histories for further investigation. Eventually, the player had confirmed that he received his payment from Slots Garden. We had closed the complaint as 'resolved', and had directed the player to open a separate complaint for another issue with Lucky Legends Casino.

The player from Virginia successfully beat the stipulated playthrough limit and requested a withdrawal. The casino requested a KYC process and a deposit of $10 in Bitcoin for address proof. While the player complied, their withdrawal request was later revoked due to casino's issues with CoinDraw. The player is unsettled about the additional waiting period stated by customer service and believes it's time for third-party intervention. We closed the complaint as resolved since the player confirmed receipt of the payment.

The player from the US requested four separate withdrawals using Bitcoin, but after two weeks, the requests were canceled and the money returned to their balance. Despite being assured that their issue would be resolved, the player hasn't received any specific support and the issue remains unresolved. The issue has been resolved successfully.

The player from South Africa had their withdrawals withheld and account blocked. The casino discontinued it's South African version, however they were able to process the withdrawal for the player and the complaint is resolved.

The player from South Africa was dissatisfied with the long withdrawal process and the casino’s support wasn’t helpful after inquiring about his withdrawal. The complaint was resolved. The player received his winnings nearly 3 months later, with unexpected fees deducted by one of the banks processing the payment.

William, a player from South Africa, won from a no deposit bonus and he is stuck on the verification process. He also expressed his dissatisfaction with the casino’s support and services. This case was successfully resolved.

The player from the US faced withdrawal issues after winning a $300 no deposit bonus. Initially, his withdrawal request was delayed and extended beyond the promised timeframe, which led to his account being locked. He was unable to access the site and could not contact the casino regarding his $300 winnings. The issue was resolved after the casino confirmed that the player's withdrawal request had been approved, and the winnings were sent to his registered Bitcoin address. The player acknowledged receipt of the funds, and the complaint was marked as resolved.

The player from the US had reported multiple approved payouts via Bitcoin in one day. However, after she received one payment, she was notified that she couldn't use Bitcoin anymore and was required to opt for a wire transfer and submit additional documents. Despite her initial resistance to opening a new account for wire transfer, as she had been initially instructed to open a Bitcoin account, the issue was eventually resolved. The player confirmed that the matter had been taken care of, leading us to close the complaint as 'resolved'.

The player from Kansas had experienced issues with her withdrawal from Planet 7 Casino as the operator had refused payouts via BTC, wire transfer, and check. The only option proposed had been opening an account with two banks, both inconveniently located for the player. After the player had opened a bank account and informed the casino, she was told to wait for a month to get her winnings due to the absence of a bank statement. However, the casino then allowed her to withdraw her winnings via Bitcoin, which she had initially requested. The player had received her winnings and was waiting for a payout from the casino's sister company, Raging Bull Casino. The Complaints Team had marked the complaint as 'resolved'.

The player from California had reported that she had requested a withdrawal two weeks prior but had not received the payout despite it having been approved. She had claimed to have received various excuses from the casino and had been told to wait longer. The player's account had been verified, and she had fulfilled her wagering requirements. She had also reported having daily, unproductive conversations with the casino. After we invited the casino representative to the conversation, the casino confirmed that the payment had been processed. The player had confirmed receipt of her winnings, albeit with some confusion due to unfamiliar emails. We had marked the complaint as 'resolved'.

The player from Australia has requested a withdrawal three weeks prior to submitting this complaint. Unfortunately, winnings haven’t been received yet. Player’s complaint has been resolved successfully.