Lapilanders Casino Review

A Finnish player has repeatedly requested withdrawal of their funds from Lapilanders casino but the casino cancels the requests every 2 days without explanation. The player reported the issue to Askgamblers and the Mga license provider. All proper documents were approved prior to the first withdrawal request. The complaint was rejected as the player stopped responding.

The player from Armenia is experiencing difficulties with the withdrawal of his winnings. Despoite providing all requested documents and contacting the casino multiple times, the player has not received a clear response about the reason for the delay. After contacting casino and their affiliates we still weren't able to get a response.

The player from Sweden is complaining about the casino requiring too many verification documents. After the player sent all the necessary documents, his account was verified and he received his winnings.

The player from Bavaria has been waiting for a withdrawal for less than two weeks. Unfortunately, their payout hasn’t been received yet. Unfortunately, the player lost his winnings before we could help, therefore, we were forced to reject this complaint.

The player from Germany had an active self-exclusion in a sister casino due to a gambling problem. He believes that he shouldn’t have been allowed to open a new account with Lapilanders Casino. The case was rejected because such cases should be handled by the regulator, and the regulator decided to reject all future similar issues of the player.

The player from Brazil has requested a withdrawal prior to submitting this complaint. Unfortunately, their winnings haven’t been received yet. The complaint was rejected because the player didn't respond to our messages and questions.

The player from the Netherlands was experiencing difficulties withdrawing his winnings due to ongoing verification. The player confirmed that his issue was resolved before we invited the casino to the thread. The complaint is resolved.

The player from Latvia could not withdraw their winnings due to the ongoing investigation. The player was then informed that their winnings had been confiscated due to them using a VPN. The player denied this, but as the casino did not respond to the complaint it was closed as 'unresolved'.

The player from Germany had an active self-exclusion in a sister casino due to a gambling problem. The player believes that he should have been banned from this Casino too. The case was rejected because the self-exclusion did not apply for the whole group. Therefore, deposit refund was not in place.

The player from Germany requested a withdrawal, but it hasn't been processed yet. The player later confirmed that the withdrawal was processed successfully, therefore we marked this complaint as resolved.

The player from Germany provided all the required documents, but the verification still hasn’t been completed. We rejected the complaint because the player didn't respond to our messages and questions.

The player from Austria had his bonus winnings cancelled due to bonus rules violation. The complaint was closed as unresolved as the casino did not respond to us and the player is waiting for an answer from the regulator.

The player from Sweden had not received a €1000 withdrawal despite the 72-hour timeframe passing, and he was not receiving any answers from the casino. His account was verified, and all documents had been accepted. The issue was resolved after the player confirmed that his case had been addressed. The Complaints Team marked the complaint as 'resolved' in their system.

The player from Germany highlighted a history of self-exclusion due to gambling addiction but noted that LCS Ltd. Group allowed account openings despite this. They were currently trying to prove their self-exclusion requests and mentioned an ignored request from 2022 at Nordscasino. The player sought restitution for amounts totaling 100€, 2700€, and 500€. The issue was resolved, and the player confirmed that a refund was received. The Complaints Team marked the complaint as 'resolved' in their system and offered assistance for any future issues.

The player from Germany is facing delay in withdrawing their €172. They received an email from the casino stating that their request is under review by another department due to heavy workload. The complaint was resolved as the player received his money.

The player from Sweden is experiencing difficulties withdrawing her winnings due to ongoing verification. Even though we have not managed to receive any response from the casino, the player eventually received their withdrawals and the case is resolved.

The player from Germany had faced a delay in receiving a promised refund of €355.00 from Betsamigo due to a self-ban from a partner casino. Despite having been informed that the refund would take 1-2 days, the player hadn't received it. After discussing the situation with us, she had decided to wait for another day. Later, she confirmed that she had received the refund, and we had marked the complaint as resolved.

The player from Ireland has requested a withdrawal less than two weeks prior to submitting this complaint. Their money hasn’t been received yet. The player later confirmed that the withdrawal was processed successfully, therefore we marked this complaint as resolved.

The player from Sweden has faced repeated attempts at verifying his account for withdrawal at Evobet, even after providing extensive identification proof. Despite getting verified, his last withdrawal request was canceled and he was again asked for a selfie verification. We tried to contact the casino, but before it replied, the player informed us that the case had already been solved, so we closed the complaint with "resolved" status.

The player from Italy requested a withdrawal, but it was canceled. The casino asked him to provide additional documents for verification. The player later confirmed that the withdrawal was processed successfully, therefore we marked this complaint as resolved.

The player from Poland had his fully verified account suspended by the casino without any explanation. His withdrawal request, which was dated 28/03, had been pending and the casino had stopped communicating. The player had been involved in sports betting and hadn't had any active bonuses. The casino had responded to the player's email, stating that his withdrawal request was being reviewed and that his account had been closed in accordance with their terms and conditions. After a few weeks, the player reported that the casino had paid him, which resolved the issue.

The player from Sweden requested a withdrawal less than two weeks prior to submitting this complaint. The payment hasn’t been processed yet. The player later confirmed that the withdrawal was processed successfully, therefore we marked this complaint as resolved.

The player from Lower Saxony submitted a withdrawal request less than two weeks prior to contacting us. Winnings haven’t been obtained up to this day. The player later confirmed that the withdrawal was processed successfully, therefore we marked this complaint as resolved.

The player from Sweden is experiencing difficulties withdrawing her winnings due to ongoing verification. The player later confirmed that the withdrawal was processed successfully, therefore we marked this complaint as resolved.

The player from Germany has requested a withdrawal one month prior to submitting this complaint and , unfortunately, winnings haven’t been received yet. We closed this complaint as "resolved" since the player informed us later about successfully getting his money.

The player from the Netherlands is experiencing difficulties withdrawing their winnings due to ongoing verification. The player later confirmed that the withdrawal was processed successfully, therefore we marked this complaint as resolved.

The player from Brazil had made a deposit on November 26, 2024, but the funds did not appear in her account. After contacting support, she was informed that the amount would be returned within 5 business days; however, it had still not been returned, and she had only received automated responses. The issue was resolved when it was confirmed that the deposit had been credited to the casino account after a week.

The player from Italy, who had previously created an account and deposited 30 Euros, had been unable to access his account as it seemed to have disappeared from the server. However, the issue was promptly resolved and the player confirmed this. Consequently, we marked the complaint as 'resolved' in our system.

The player from Canada had experienced delays with his withdrawal request of 492.75 from the online casino. Despite having successfully withdrawn funds in January 2024, his request was pending for two weeks without any updates or requests for additional documents. He confirmed that he had completed a full KYC verification and provided all necessary documents. The player did not use any bonus and played Live Blackjack and Sportsbook. After our intervention and communication with the casino, the player received his payment and decided to close his account. The issue had been successfully resolved.

The player from British Columbia has requested a withdrawal of CAD$1000 multiple times, but it has been continuously revoked for KYC. Despite having his KYC approved several times, the withdrawal remains in the queue to be processed as per a live chat agent. The complaint was resolved as the player got paid out.

The player from Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania has requested a withdrawal prior to submitting this complaint. Unfortunately, their winnings haven’t been received yet. The player later confirmed that the withdrawal was processed successfully, therefore we marked this complaint as resolved.

The player from Denmark won CAD 500 but the casino was continuously requesting additional documents for their deposit, despite having provided all possible documents from their Skrill account. We contacted the casino, but before it replied to our message, the player informed us about the successful verification of their account and receiving the winnings. We closed the complaint as resolved.

The player's account was under investigation for over 3 months without any update regarding it's status. The casino informed the player that upon completing the investigation, some of the player's bets had been voided but that they were now able to make a withdrawal. Upon receipt of all outstanding payments, the issue was resolved.

The player from Germany was complaining about the lengthy verification process. Moreover, the player's winnings were confiscated. The complaint was temporarily closed as unresolved because it was reported to ADR, and we were waiting for the official results of its investigation. We reopened the complaint after being provided with the ADR's final decision. Although ADR decided in the favour of the player, the casino stopped responding and has not followed the instructions made by the authority while the complaint was open. Later, when the player contacted us regarding another and different issue in the casino, he confirmed that he received the disputed funds approximately 2 weeks after the complaint was closed as unresolved. The complaint is resolved.

The player from the Netherlands has been blocked during the verification process. The player later confirmed that the withdrawal was processed successfully, therefore we marked this complaint as resolved.

The player from the Netherlands has experienced a technical glitch. After cancelling a withdrawal, his winnings disappeared completely instead of showing up back in the balance. The player managed to sort the issue out with the casino’s support.

The player from Canada had experienced a delay in his withdrawal of 250 CAD from an online casino. The casino had advertised a 48-hour withdrawal process, but it had taken 13 days for the player to receive his money. The player had expressed dissatisfaction with the misleading information provided by the casino. The complaint had been resolved after the player confirmed receipt of his winnings.

The player from Austria had difficulty withdrawing winnings from a casino and sought assistance. The player's account verification was delayed due to a lack of utility bills in his name, despite providing a bank statement. After a period of inactivity and further communication, the player's account was eventually verified, and he successfully withdrew the first €1,000. The remaining €1,000 was also received shortly thereafter. The complaint was resolved as the player confirmed receiving all his winnings.