ForumComplaints DiscussionQuestion about Gambling websites with Curaçao license using incorrect Merchant Category code

Question about Gambling websites with Curaçao license using incorrect Merchant Category code (page 260)

1 year ago by kirekin
|
498676 views 5221 replies |
|
1...259 260 261...264
Add post
Williamj86
3 days ago

They have already raised them im sure you said bud

paulmcewan05
3 days ago

Yeah they have just thought it might help my case if they know my gambling block was on

Williamj86
3 days ago

If they have raised them that is it no need to justify anything now they would have checked that it bud they cannot do any more on their side now

Edited by author 3 days ago
paulmcewan05
3 days ago

But maybe if they decline the refund I could use that to go forward with the FOC you think. How you doing Anways buddy

paulmcewan05
3 days ago

What are you saying the link is to Sumup mate? What is a description on bank saying?

Williamj86
3 days ago

If they decline thats it bud nothing FOS can do as they tried them I am not bad mate keeping going

boots2024
3 days ago

Hi Boots the bank said this and I seen sumup on screen when paying it says smpay thats all I know

3 days ago

Hi Boots the bank said this and I seen sumup on screen when paying it says smpay thats all I know

3 days ago

But sumup have not replied to say it is not them which is odd as you would think they would right away ! maybe the bank can see where they go

paulmcewan05
3 days ago

I’m not convinced mate, I’ve used Sumup loads of times for genuine, non gambling related transactions and it comes up as Sumup*(name of merchant here).



boots2024
3 days ago

Ok maybe that bank worker is wrong then that is what he told me though and the complaints hander said he will review phone calls as part of the investigation just shows you if not how much they are not doing the job correctly ! I deffo seen sumup appear when doing a payment though if it is them it should be a certain refund for all no questions asked !

paulmcewan05
3 days ago

I’m hoping so as they’d be more of an operation than these dodgy processors.

What were the transaction description? Maginc?

boots2024
3 days ago

(I.e Sumup more likely to play ball and refund)

boots2024
3 days ago

Yes mine had that on it Boots !

boots2024
3 days ago

Well yes but no reply so far ! I deffo think the bank can recover these Uk based transactions easily

Edited by author 3 days ago
Post by Elijahanth was deleted
paulmcewan05
3 days ago

So let’s assume it’s not Sumup how do you successfully do a chargeback in that situation since you have nothing on the processor or merchant?

boots2024
3 days ago

Well its still incorrect MCC code so just the same thing Boots

3 days ago

SmPayMaginc

SmPayGamingstore

Byte News


It is this 3 nobody of us have founded yet.

tamiirender
yesterday

That’s great news.


i M about to do same with them so gives me hope.


can i ask were you truthful about what transactions were for

Billyh18
yesterday

Can't find a contact for Santeda, as for goldenbet, they pretty much said i'm liable for not reading their ToS as they're prohibited from offering their services to the UK, wouldn't help me at all, waiting for the ombudsman still as chase basically said it was gambling and they don't cover gambling per mastercard ToS even though the MCC wasn't gambling, it was gaming and digital goods. The FoS has been around a seven week wait so far, maybe a touch longer and they've not began the investigation proper, just said they will appoint an agent to my case when they have one free as they have an increased workload.

1...259 260 261...264
Go to pageof 264 pages

Join the community

You must be logged in to add a post.

Sign up
flash-message-news
Don’t miss any news from the gambling industry
Trustpilot_flash_alt
What’s your opinion on Casino Guru? Share your feedback
Follow us on social media – Daily posts, no deposit bonuses, new slots, and more
Subscribe to our newsletter for newest no deposit bonuses, new slots, and other news