Background and Initial KYC Attempt
A couple of months ago, an underage or US (cannot remember exactly, we're online buddies - just bottom line he couldn't verify) friend of mine had funds locked in their Rollbit account. I know this wasn’t ideal, but in good faith, I decided to try to help him by completing the KYC on his behalf, hoping to help him access his funds and close the account. To be clear, there was no fraudulent intent or involvement in anything suspicious like money laundering—just me trying to help a friend in a bit of a predicament.
Rollbit’s team, including a representative named Razer, quickly recognised that the KYC was not from the account owner. The KYC was rejected, and they specifically requested that the account holder themselves complete the KYC to proceed (https://imgur.com/a/Y0xJ1OH). This step clearly shows that Rollbit acknowledged the account did not belong to me, and it ended up working out – my friend was able to withdraw his funds, and the account was then closed.
Creation of My Own Rollbit Account and Subsequent Ban
Fast forward, I decided to create my own Rollbit account, made a $1,2000 deposit, and completed KYC under my name, thinking everything was straightforward. However, shortly after, I was hit with a ban for "ban evasion." Along with the ban, Rollbit seized $1,200 of my funds. I reached out to explain the situation, but they maintained the ban and refused to release the funds. (https://imgur.com/a/F5JreBb)
I completely understand that attempting to KYC on behalf of someone else is against policy, and I’ve acknowledged that to Rollbit. But given that my KYC attempt for my friend was rejected, and they explicitly acknowledged that I was not the account owner, it’s clear there was never an attempt to create or control a secondary account. I believe the fact that Rollbit treated the accounts as separate during this process underscores that they were indeed independent accounts.
While I understand the ban may still apply, I feel that seizing my funds doesn’t align with the actual events and circumstances. It seems a bit extreme, especially when there was no intention to deceive, and Rollbit’s own actions demonstrated their awareness of the account separation.
Acknowledgement of Rollbit’s Right to Seize Funds for Ban Evasion
I acknowledge that, according to Clause 4.2 of the Terms of Service, Rollbit may restrict accounts and withhold funds if multiple accounts or "ban evasion" are detected. Additionally, Clause 5.1 allows Rollbit to withhold funds if it suspects an account is being used improperly or for a third party’s benefit.
However, in my case:
Initial KYC Separation: When I attempted KYC for my friend’s account, my submission was rejected, and Rollbit’s team, including Razer, explicitly acknowledged that I was not the account holder. This recognition and subsequent rejection demonstrate that my personal account was separate and independently verified.
No Deceptive Intent: My personal account was funded and verified without any intent to evade previous bans or to deceive, as Rollbit’s own verification process demonstrated.
Request for Fund Withdrawal Based on Terms and Account Separation
With this context in mind, and in light of Clause 5.3, which states, "If we close Your Rollbit Account, and believe […] that any portion or all of the remaining balance is due to You, we will inform You of the available means to withdraw that remaining balance," I respectfully request that my remaining funds be withdrawn. I believe this clause applies here, given the account’s independent verification and clear separation.
Background and Initial KYC Attempt
A couple of months ago, an underage or US (cannot remember exactly, we're online buddies - just bottom line he couldn't verify) friend of mine had funds locked in their Rollbit account. I know this wasn’t ideal, but in good faith, I decided to try to help him by completing the KYC on his behalf, hoping to help him access his funds and close the account. To be clear, there was no fraudulent intent or involvement in anything suspicious like money laundering—just me trying to help a friend in a bit of a predicament.
Rollbit’s team, including a representative named Razer, quickly recognised that the KYC was not from the account owner. The KYC was rejected, and they specifically requested that the account holder themselves complete the KYC to proceed (https://imgur.com/a/Y0xJ1OH). This step clearly shows that Rollbit acknowledged the account did not belong to me, and it ended up working out – my friend was able to withdraw his funds, and the account was then closed.
Creation of My Own Rollbit Account and Subsequent Ban
Fast forward, I decided to create my own Rollbit account, made a $1,2000 deposit, and completed KYC under my name, thinking everything was straightforward. However, shortly after, I was hit with a ban for "ban evasion." Along with the ban, Rollbit seized $1,200 of my funds. I reached out to explain the situation, but they maintained the ban and refused to release the funds. (https://imgur.com/a/F5JreBb)
I completely understand that attempting to KYC on behalf of someone else is against policy, and I’ve acknowledged that to Rollbit. But given that my KYC attempt for my friend was rejected, and they explicitly acknowledged that I was not the account owner, it’s clear there was never an attempt to create or control a secondary account. I believe the fact that Rollbit treated the accounts as separate during this process underscores that they were indeed independent accounts.
While I understand the ban may still apply, I feel that seizing my funds doesn’t align with the actual events and circumstances. It seems a bit extreme, especially when there was no intention to deceive, and Rollbit’s own actions demonstrated their awareness of the account separation.
Acknowledgement of Rollbit’s Right to Seize Funds for Ban Evasion
I acknowledge that, according to Clause 4.2 of the Terms of Service, Rollbit may restrict accounts and withhold funds if multiple accounts or "ban evasion" are detected. Additionally, Clause 5.1 allows Rollbit to withhold funds if it suspects an account is being used improperly or for a third party’s benefit.
However, in my case:
Initial KYC Separation: When I attempted KYC for my friend’s account, my submission was rejected, and Rollbit’s team, including Razer, explicitly acknowledged that I was not the account holder. This recognition and subsequent rejection demonstrate that my personal account was separate and independently verified.
No Deceptive Intent: My personal account was funded and verified without any intent to evade previous bans or to deceive, as Rollbit’s own verification process demonstrated.
Request for Fund Withdrawal Based on Terms and Account Separation
With this context in mind, and in light of Clause 5.3, which states, "If we close Your Rollbit Account, and believe […] that any portion or all of the remaining balance is due to You, we will inform You of the available means to withdraw that remaining balance," I respectfully request that my remaining funds be withdrawn. I believe this clause applies here, given the account’s independent verification and clear separation.