Game suppliers and money transmitters

What do you think, should the game supplier be responsible for which casinos rent the games to. There are clearly casinos that operate dishonestly with money. If the casino doesn't pay the winnings, then the responsibility should lie with the game supplier and pay the player's winnings....? The same for banks because they enable deposits

Hi, let's say if it worked like that it would be ideal, but it's just utopia. The fact that the casino doesn't pay players based on something has nothing to do with the game provider, and neither does the bank. Because if we take it on the example of anything, then a lot of things would be the banks' fault for letting you deposit somewhere. 

I think that every player has the sense to find out more about the casino before depositing his money to minimize the potential unpleasantness that could occur. For example, you can do this by checking out the user reviews and complaints on our site, which can be quite useful when it comes to getting an overview of a casino. 

So these are my recommendations and my view on the matter.