The ECJ further clarifies that, in the context of an application for a stay of enforcement proceedings, the courts and authorities of the executing Member State are not authorized to examine a decision made in the Member State of origin on an undisputed claim or its confirmation as a European Enforcement Order. When examining such a request for a stay, in order to determine the existence of exceptional circumstances, these courts or bodies would have to limit themselves to weighing up the creditor's interests in immediate enforcement and the conflicting interest of the debtor. Finally, the ECJ states that if the enforceability of a decision confirmed as a European Enforcement Order has been suspended in the Member State of origin, the national court of the enforcing Member State must ensure that the proceedings have been stayed.
on ECJ, judgment of February 16, 2023 - C-393/21
Editorial team beck-aktuell, February 17, 2023.
Related Links
On the topic on the Internet
The full text of the ECJ ruling can be found on the Court's website.
From the beck-online database
ECJ Advocate General, Judicial Cooperation in Civil Matters, Regulation (EC) No. 805/2004, European Enforcement Order for Undisputed Claims, Suspension of the enforcement of a decision confirmed as a European Enforcement Order, Requirements, Exceptional Circumstances, BeckRS 2022, 28046
Contact
editorial staff
Customer service
Legal
imprint
data protection
service
Newsletter
Media service
Career
Follow us
Condition
Automatic translation: