ForumCasinosExecution Pokerstars. Apparently, payment is not voluntary

Execution Pokerstars. Apparently, payment is not voluntary (page 49)

2 years ago by marketingskislo
|
228927 views 1996 replies |
|
1...48 49 50...100
Add post
Nichtmitmir
10 months ago

No, as I said, I received the same answer 😂 and then after several emails and calls, it was explained to me and I was told that standard answers that went to all clients were always sent automatically. But they were no longer current and correct because Malta just introduced this new law.

I'm also currently being told that an execution takes an average of 2 years and does anyone believe that?

That's why I wanted to ask whether YOU are already on the ecourt side or have an execution title?

Automatic translation:
krati85
10 months ago

The first appeals will be decided in January

Automatic translation:
10 months ago

So have a nice evening.

Even if it takes longer for you, always remember that you were and are the pioneers that such judgments could arise over time because you remained true to your line.


Many greetings from Germany

Automatic translation:
krati85
10 months ago

GL

voizua92
10 months ago

Which law firm?

Automatic translation:
Nichtmitmir
10 months ago

GL

voizua92
10 months ago

Ah yes, there was something😅

Automatic translation:
abelinglaekamp
10 months ago

Dude, some of these casinos have already received licenses in Germany even though they ignore all judgments and don't pay, obviously the responsible German authorities don't give a damn about how reliable they are or they simply take another subsidiary...and the judges in Malta have to decide this way because the corrupt Maltese government has passed an EU illegal law according to which they cannot decide otherwise.

Automatic translation:
chinyuhansinhua
10 months ago

It must and it will work out in our favor! But you are right! MrGreen is MrGreen, the only problem is that MrGreen Germany has a different operator than MrGreen Austria, as far as I noticed in the video from G&L!

Automatic translation:
krati85
10 months ago

Yes, you misunderstood that, he just says that a decision will be made in January as to whether they will submit this to the ECJ as to whether this new law is EU compliant. This is not a result and how long this will be before the ECJ is anyone's guess. Especially since they are obviously the one Ltd. at any time. close up and move on with someone else...


Automatic translation:
voizua92
10 months ago

So I can't find myself on the page, it's hard for me to look through it...

Automatic translation:
10 months ago

Hello everyone,


I've been reading quietly for months, but I have a court date this month against Betway. My question is: does anyone have experience with Betway?

Automatic translation:
krati85
10 months ago

In the end, the operators don't matter because there are parent companies. And then they stick. That's how it was for me three years ago when the whole thing started in Germany. In my case it was a large company that represented three identical numbers, and shortly before the court hearing, the operator changed, but the parent company remained the same. So here in Germany everyone has paid so far because Germany is by far the largest market in Europe and because they don't want to mess up with the supervisory authority. The German authorities are very much looking at how operators in other countries who have a license here in Germany behave to see whether they are meeting their obligations. The difference to Austria is simple, the market is simply too small and the Austrian monopoly remains in place with no chance of a license. That's why all the casinos say to themselves, they can do us and delay everything.

And the thing about the judges is not right, because the judges are independent, as here, and have to adhere to the law that the EU has decided. Here in Germany nothing is suspended or rejected anymore because the legal situation is clear, in this case the European one. Why the judges in Malta decide the way they do is unclear. You are not allowed to block the European enforcement judgments. What the Maltese government introduced as a law is irrelevant.

Automatic translation:
krati85
10 months ago

The ECJ further clarifies that, in the context of an application for a stay of enforcement proceedings, the courts and authorities of the executing Member State are not authorized to examine a decision made in the Member State of origin on an undisputed claim or its confirmation as a European Enforcement Order. When examining such a request for a stay, in order to determine the existence of exceptional circumstances, these courts or bodies would have to limit themselves to weighing up the creditor's interests in immediate enforcement and the conflicting interest of the debtor. Finally, the ECJ states that if the enforceability of a decision confirmed as a European Enforcement Order has been suspended in the Member State of origin, the national court of the enforcing Member State must ensure that the proceedings have been stayed.

on ECJ, judgment of February 16, 2023 - C-393/21

Editorial team beck-aktuell, February 17, 2023.

Related Links

On the topic on the Internet

The full text of the ECJ ruling can be found on the Court's website.

From the beck-online database

ECJ Advocate General, Judicial Cooperation in Civil Matters, Regulation (EC) No. 805/2004, European Enforcement Order for Undisputed Claims, Suspension of the enforcement of a decision confirmed as a European Enforcement Order, Requirements, Exceptional Circumstances, BeckRS 2022, 28046




Contact

editorial staff

Customer service

Legal

imprint

data protection

service

Newsletter

Media service

Career

Follow us






Condition

Automatic translation:
abelinglaekamp
10 months ago

Pretty much everything you say here is simply wrong

There are already numerous judgments according to which the parent companies are not liable, if they were liable one would not have to rely on Maltese enforcement proceedings....and precisely because the parent companies are not liable, some are now trying to claim personal liability from the managing directors. But even if you get away with it, the assets of the parent companies remain untouched and you can see whether you can grab the private assets of the managing directors who are also based in other EU countries, which is probably even more hopeless than in Malta....

Automatic translation:
chinyuhansinhua
10 months ago

Aha, it's just information from my lawyer and judgment from the Eugh etc. Well, then you should get smart.

Automatic translation:
abelinglaekamp
10 months ago

Are you currently still in ongoing proceedings?

Automatic translation:
10 months ago

Hi,

How long does it actually take for the OLG to go through with the appeal?

Automatic translation:
Nichtmitmir
10 months ago

4 weeks or so

Automatic translation:
10 months ago

Ok,...quick. Thanks


Automatic translation:
1...48 49 50...100
Go to pageof 100 pages

Join the community

You must be logged in to add a post.

Sign up
flash-message-news
Don’t miss any news from the gambling industry
Trustpilot_flash_alt
What’s your opinion on Casino Guru? Share your feedback
Follow us on social media – Daily posts, no deposit bonuses, new slots, and more
Subscribe to our newsletter for newest no deposit bonuses, new slots, and other news