Depositwin Casino Review

The player from Slovenia claimed that DepositWin Casino had deactivated his account due to being in a 'restricted country' the day after he won 1000€. The player had queried how depositing, gambling, and registration were possible from Slovenia, but not withdrawing winnings. After discussing the issue, the casino maintained that they had acted in accordance with their Terms and Conditions and offered to refund the player's deposits (80€). We had suggested the casino should have checked for restricted countries during account creation and paid out all winnings if they allowed a player from a restricted country to play due to their own oversight. However, the casino declined to change their decision. The complaint was closed as 'unresolved'. We had recommended the player to contact the Antillephone Gaming Authority for further assistance.

The player from Tunisia had deposited $120 into depositwin.com and had faced issues with withdrawal delay and cancellation. He had been told that he needed to wager his real money more, despite the casino's claim of wager-free bonuses. Upon reviewing the casino's terms and conditions, we discovered that the player had to wager the deposited funds in a 1:1 ratio before withdrawal. This rule was common among casinos due to Anti-Money Laundering Regulations. The complaint case was rejected due to a lack of response from the player.

The player from Germany is reporting that Depositwin Casino refuses to pay out a €250 win from a tournament. After depositing and wagering a certain amount, the player engaged in a minor bonus hunt, but this was before any withdrawal was made. After a withdrawal of €200, their balance was zero before they won €250 from the tournament. However, the casino claimed this was a breach of their terms and conditions, which the player disputes. The complaint was closed as the player wanted to close the case.

The player's winnings were capped as the casino claims he used a bonus. The player used a bonus that was advertised as a "no wagering" bonus and requested a withdrawal after winning from free spins. This effectively canceled the rest of the bonus. The player continued to play with what they assumed was their deposited amount, then canceled the withdrawal and accumulated more winnings. The winnings were then capped upon requesting a withdrawal in accordance with the terms of the previously used bonus, and the player stated that when the first withdrawal was requested the necessary wagering hadn't been completed, so the funds were still subject to the bonus terms. We disagreed with the decision of the casino in this case, but as they stated that their decision was final, the complaint was closed as 'unresolved'.