Nucleonbet Casino Review

The player from the Netherlands reports that Nucleonbet and its sister casino Betstro allowed him to play despite being in CRUKS and manipulated the RTP of a specific game. The player requested us not to investigate the case anymore, so we rejected the complaint.

The player from Sweden requested a withdrawal less than two weeks prior to submitting this complaint. The payment hasn’t been processed yet. The player later confirmed that the withdrawal was processed successfully, therefore we marked this complaint as resolved.

The player from Germany is requesting a full deposit refund after he requested a self-exclusion in a sister casino. We did not receive any reply from the casino team, therefore the case was closed as 'unresolved'.

The player from Finland had his account blocked without further explanation. Even if we assumed that the issue has been resolved, without a confirmation from the player, we were forced to reject this complaint.

The player's withdrawal is delayed for over a month. The complaint has been closed as 'unresolved' because the casino failed to reply and cooperate in resolving the complaint. There was no progress even two weeks after the casino was notified about the player's complaint.

The player from Portugal is experiencing difficulties withdrawing his winnings due to ongoing verification. The complaint has been closed as 'unresolved' because the casino failed to reply and cooperate in resolving the complaint. There was no progress even two weeks after the casino was notified about the player's complaint.

The player from Lower Saxony submitted a withdrawal request less than two weeks prior to contacting us. Winnings haven’t been obtained up to this day. The player later confirmed that the withdrawal was processed successfully, therefore we marked this complaint as resolved.

The player from Finland had his winnings from sports betting voided and account blocked due to accusation of “prohibited practices”. We rejected the complaint because the player didn't respond to our messages and questions.

The player from Finland had been waiting for his withdrawal to be processed for two weeks at the time he submitted the complaint. A few days later, he received a part of the winnings, but at the same time, the casino significantly reduced the remaining amount on the player's gaming account, claiming that his winnings were accumulated with help of a bonus, however, the player states that he had asked the casino's customer support to remove all bonuses before he started using the deposited amount. We closed the complaint as 'Unresolved' because the casino failed to provide a statement on the player's complaint in the given time frame.

The player from Hesse has requested a withdrawal less than two weeks prior to submitting this complaint. Their money hasn’t been received yet. The complaint was rejected because the player didn't respond to our messages and questions.

The player from Germany accumulated a significant amount of funds in their gaming account and requested a withdrawal. The casino only paid out a certain part of the amount, referring to the limitation on the amount that can be won by one player in one day. The limitation is set out by the casino's Terms and Conditions, however, at Casino Guru, we believe that no such limitations should be in place and that players should be allowed to withdraw their real money winnings in full, as long as they're not in breach of the Terms and Conditions. The casino did not provide any statements on the player's complaint. The complaint was closed as 'Unresolved' and classified as 'Against fair gambling'.

The player from Sweden is experiencing difficulties withdrawing her winnings due to ongoing verification. The player later confirmed that the withdrawal was processed successfully, therefore we marked this complaint as resolved.

The player from Finland had had her account closed in sister casino. She believes that she should have been banned from Nucleonbet Casino too. We did not receive any reply from the casino team, therefore the case was closed as 'unresolved'.

The player from Germany had an active self-exclusion in a sister casino due to a gambling problem. They believe that it shouldn't be allowed to register a new account with Nucleonbet Casino. We rejected the complaint because the player didn't respond to our messages and questions.

The player from Germany has requested a withdrawal one month prior to submitting this complaint and , unfortunately, winnings haven’t been received yet. We closed this complaint as "resolved" since the player informed us later about successfully getting his money.

The player from Sweden is experiencing difficulties withdrawing their winnings due to ongoing verification. There was no response from the casino and as the player has submitted a complaint to the official ADR service, the complaint has been closed temporarily whilst we await their decision. We contacted the player at a later date to see if the ADR had come to a decision. Unfortunately, the player did not respond to our messages so the complaint was rejected.

The player from the Netherlands is experiencing difficulties withdrawing their winnings due to ongoing verification. The player later confirmed that the withdrawal was processed successfully, therefore we marked this complaint as resolved.

The player from the Netherlands is experiencing difficulties withdrawing their winnings due to ongoing verification. We rejected the complaint because the player didn't respond to our messages and questions.

The player from the Netherlands had the account blocked for an audit after accumulating a substantial win. We ended up closing the complaint as ‘unresolved’ because the casino failed to reply. The player was informed to contact the casino's ADR service.

The player's account was blocked without further explanation. The remaining active balance is still held by the casino. We ended up closing the complaint as ‘unresolved’ because the casino failed to reply.

The player from Germany is facing delay in withdrawing their €172. They received an email from the casino stating that their request is under review by another department due to heavy workload. The complaint was resolved as the player received his money.

The player from Sweden is experiencing difficulties withdrawing her winnings due to ongoing verification. Even though we have not managed to receive any response from the casino, the player eventually received their withdrawals and the case is resolved.

The player from Germany had faced a delay in receiving a promised refund of €355.00 from Betsamigo due to a self-ban from a partner casino. Despite having been informed that the refund would take 1-2 days, the player hadn't received it. After discussing the situation with us, she had decided to wait for another day. Later, she confirmed that she had received the refund, and we had marked the complaint as resolved.

The player from Ireland has requested a withdrawal less than two weeks prior to submitting this complaint. Their money hasn’t been received yet. The player later confirmed that the withdrawal was processed successfully, therefore we marked this complaint as resolved.

The player from Sweden is complaining about the casino requiring too many verification documents. After the player sent all the necessary documents, his account was verified and he received his winnings.

The player from the Netherlands was experiencing difficulties withdrawing his winnings due to ongoing verification. The player confirmed that his issue was resolved before we invited the casino to the thread. The complaint is resolved.

The player from Germany requested a withdrawal, but it hasn't been processed yet. The player later confirmed that the withdrawal was processed successfully, therefore we marked this complaint as resolved.

The player from Sweden has faced repeated attempts at verifying his account for withdrawal at Evobet, even after providing extensive identification proof. Despite getting verified, his last withdrawal request was canceled and he was again asked for a selfie verification. We tried to contact the casino, but before it replied, the player informed us that the case had already been solved, so we closed the complaint with "resolved" status.

The player from Italy requested a withdrawal, but it was canceled. The casino asked him to provide additional documents for verification. The player later confirmed that the withdrawal was processed successfully, therefore we marked this complaint as resolved.

The player from Italy, who had previously created an account and deposited 30 Euros, had been unable to access his account as it seemed to have disappeared from the server. However, the issue was promptly resolved and the player confirmed this. Consequently, we marked the complaint as 'resolved' in our system.

The player from Canada had experienced delays with his withdrawal request of 492.75 from the online casino. Despite having successfully withdrawn funds in January 2024, his request was pending for two weeks without any updates or requests for additional documents. He confirmed that he had completed a full KYC verification and provided all necessary documents. The player did not use any bonus and played Live Blackjack and Sportsbook. After our intervention and communication with the casino, the player received his payment and decided to close his account. The issue had been successfully resolved.

The player from British Columbia has requested a withdrawal of CAD$1000 multiple times, but it has been continuously revoked for KYC. Despite having his KYC approved several times, the withdrawal remains in the queue to be processed as per a live chat agent. The complaint was resolved as the player got paid out.

The player from Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania has requested a withdrawal prior to submitting this complaint. Unfortunately, their winnings haven’t been received yet. The player later confirmed that the withdrawal was processed successfully, therefore we marked this complaint as resolved.

The player from Denmark won CAD 500 but the casino was continuously requesting additional documents for their deposit, despite having provided all possible documents from their Skrill account. We contacted the casino, but before it replied to our message, the player informed us about the successful verification of their account and receiving the winnings. We closed the complaint as resolved.

The player's account was under investigation for over 3 months without any update regarding it's status. The casino informed the player that upon completing the investigation, some of the player's bets had been voided but that they were now able to make a withdrawal. Upon receipt of all outstanding payments, the issue was resolved.

The player from Germany was complaining about the lengthy verification process. Moreover, the player's winnings were confiscated. The complaint was temporarily closed as unresolved because it was reported to ADR, and we were waiting for the official results of its investigation. We reopened the complaint after being provided with the ADR's final decision. Although ADR decided in the favour of the player, the casino stopped responding and has not followed the instructions made by the authority while the complaint was open. Later, when the player contacted us regarding another and different issue in the casino, he confirmed that he received the disputed funds approximately 2 weeks after the complaint was closed as unresolved. The complaint is resolved.

The player from the Netherlands has been blocked during the verification process. The player later confirmed that the withdrawal was processed successfully, therefore we marked this complaint as resolved.

The player from the Netherlands has experienced a technical glitch. After cancelling a withdrawal, his winnings disappeared completely instead of showing up back in the balance. The player managed to sort the issue out with the casino’s support.

The player from Canada had experienced a delay in his withdrawal of 250 CAD from an online casino. The casino had advertised a 48-hour withdrawal process, but it had taken 13 days for the player to receive his money. The player had expressed dissatisfaction with the misleading information provided by the casino. The complaint had been resolved after the player confirmed receipt of his winnings.