I wasn't gonna write anything more, but I have to react to this:
However, respectfully, based on the listed rule 11.5, I contend that sports betting was the primary reason for your account closure. Rule 11.5 is comprehensive and contains paragraphs directly related to your betting habits and the games you wager on."
Most of the cases and situations mentioned in this rule are not possible to prove and not possible to verify.
It's easy to show that someone used double accounts or some money laundering probably, but the betting habits are something else.
Basically they are asking here to make a betting decion based on radnom pick, 1 X 2 with their eyes closed. Only in that case you are considered as recreational player, but also only if you don't win. Try to win some large multibet, and try to withdraw that amount, same thing is going to happen.
If I like to search for best odds and compare the odds, and look for tonight's lineups, who is injured and who plays in a team where he doesn't want to be, if I follow social posts of players, if I follow the odds developments and the change throughout a day, and after all that find some value for me somewhere, I have every right to to take that bet and try to cash in on my hard work.
I consider my research a hard work.
If the Casino on the other hand, finds this process to be unfair, they have every right to declare a bet a voided bet. And they have a right to limit players they see as a pattern or professional players.
But, for a thousand and first time, they don't have the right to steal your money as some crazy imagined compensation for something!
Actually they could have that right If they were to prove that all of the mentioned activities are against the betting rules of the gambling and sports licence holder.
And than also, the licence provider has to confirm that this praxis of confiscating funds of players for compensation is in compliance with current laws of the state, in this case Curaçao.
I simply don't see it as possible, I mean you have drug cartels with convicted members where the state has trouble in confiscating all of the property due to legal reasons.
In short, suprabets treats us worse then the members of drug cartels are treated from the state.
Edited by author 8 months ago
Automatic translation: